• Our Blogger

    Fr. Joseph Jenkins

  • An important theme for this blog is the scene in the New Testament where Jesus can be found FLOGGING the money-changers out of the temple. My header above depicts a priest FLOGGING the devils that distort the faith and assault believers. The faith that gives us consolation can and should also make us very uncomfortable. Both Divine Mercy and Divine Justice meet in Jesus. Priests are ministers of reconciliation, but never at the cost of truth. In or out of season, we must be courageous in preaching and living out the Gospel of Life. The title of my blog is a play on words, not Flogger Priest but Blogger Priest.

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Father Joe's avatarFather Joe on The Prayer to Saint Michael at…
    Inveilis's avatarInveilis on Ask a Priest
    Joanne M Rowan's avatarJoanne M Rowan on Reflecting Upon SSPX Dissent…
    Joanne M Rowan's avatarJoanne M Rowan on The SSPX Makes It Itself Out M…
    Jeremy's avatarJeremy on Ask a Priest

Conformity about Essentials, Freedom about Accidentals

Priest holding communion wafer in front of a woman with hands clasped in prayer

This statement is taken from the SSPX Profession of Faith . . .

Here we begin to see a problem with the SSPX stance. What is said about the Eucharist as the substantial presence of the complete risen Christ is true. It is what we believe. But then there is a not-so-subtle opinion, more subjective than measured by immutable doctrine. The SSPX rejects the reformed liturgy as a “practice which weakens faith in the Real Presence, the respect due to the Eucharist,” and “trivializes Holy Communion.” The SSPX statement even makes liturgical architecture into a matter of faith, given what they define as the “sacred character of the sanctuary.” As a priest aware of the sacred beauty of the Tridentine Mass, I can attest disagreement to their negative assessment against the Missal of Paul VI. The reformed liturgy cannot be defined by abuses in its administration. No matter whether the priest faces away (East) or in the direction of the people, he is still facing and offering his ministrations at the altar. Certain cathedral churches with central altars, always had people behind and in front and on the sides or the celebrant. The priest raises his eyes to heaven and that is where we should set our sights. While communion on the tongue is normative, for the first thousand years the preferred manner was in the hand. Either option is permitted today. It is preferred that tabernacles be central to the worship space, but even if this is not so, the real presence of Christ is still honored.  Indeed, in such cases the gravity given the altar of sacrifice is highlighted in terms of worship. It is okay that SSPX members prefer the older forms. However, it is wrong that they would condemn and force the rest of the Church to abandon the reformed liturgy. I would argue fidelity about essentials and freedom about accidentals. They would interpret their 600,000 lay worshipers as the faithful remnant against the one-and-a-half billion Catholics in juridical union with the Holy See. They would insist that their rebellious two serving bishops should be able to dictate to the 5,600 faithful bishops of the Catholic Church who are one with the Pope. No way— it will never happen. No matter whether they appreciate it or not, they malign our legitimate pastors, the faith of our people and the presence and activity of Christ in our reformed sacraments. Their own profession of faith will come back to condemn them.

Same Priest, Same Victim, Same Sacrifice

Triptych painting showing the Last Supper on the left, Jesus' crucifixion in the center, and a priest celebrating Mass on the right.

This statement is taken from the SSPX Profession of Faith . . .

Yes, the Mass is the unbloody re-presentation of Calvary. Yes, it is truly a sacrifice.  However, I suspect that the SSPX is reading the word “memorial” in a secular fashion, for instance as a statue or monument or plaque might memorialize a person or a moment in history. This is not how the fathers of Vatican II would interpret the word.  The remembrance or memorial of the Mass is an “anamnesis” wherein that which is recalled is made truly present. It is not a nostalgic remembrance at all.  Jesus at Calvary is more than a historical event.  The Holy Mass makes the oblation of Calvary immediate and present.  Thus, we could clarify that the Mass is a command performance that Jesus tells us at the Last Supper to do in “remembrance” of him— the paschal meal of the new covenant and the real propitiatory sacrifice of his Passion. The Supper or Mass is entwined with Christ’s paschal mystery, the Cross. It is not simply a symbolic remembrance, but a liturgical ritual that realizes the one-time sacrificial action of Christ on Calvary.  Jesus is the priest and victim on Calvary, and he is the priest at the sacrifice of the Mass.  It is the same priest, the same victim and the same event.