• Our Blogger

    Fr. Joseph Jenkins

  • The blog header depicts an important and yet mis-understood New Testament scene, Jesus flogging the money-changers out of the temple. I selected it because the faith that gives us consolation can also make us very uncomfortable. Both Divine Mercy and Divine Justice meet in Jesus. Priests are ministers of reconciliation, but never at the cost of truth. In or out of season, we must be courageous in preaching and living out the Gospel of Life. The title of my blog is a play on words, not Flogger Priest but Blogger Priest.

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Barbara King's avatarBarbara King on Ask a Priest
    Ben Kirk's avatarBen Kirk on Ask a Priest
    Jeremy Kok's avatarJeremy Kok on Ask a Priest
    Barbara's avatarBarbara on Ask a Priest
    forsamuraimarket's avatarforsamuraimarket on Ask a Priest

Faith Formation: Access to Helpful Written Resources

Sharing a few personal thoughts…

We need to facilitate the use of faith outlines and written documents that are available. When there are important archdiocesan initiatives or fundraisers, we receive talking points for homilies. Many years ago the Newman clubs on college campuses offered sample lectures or CATECHESIS SUMMARIES that volunteer catechists could follow. Such notes could be coordinated with the universal catechism and the USCCB catechism. An example of an attempt to do this is offered by Fr. Eamon Tobin (Ascension Church, Melbourne, Florida). He makes his outlines available online. This would help insure both uniformity and that proper content is given to adults. A library of pdf files could be offered to believers. Important links are already available, as to the New American Bible at the USCCB site and the universal catechism at the Vatican site. The Knights of Columbus offer online versions of their Catholic Information Service booklets. There are a number of independent sites that have taken the initiative in posting links and materials of interest to Catholics; many of which are good and orthodox. Church leaders must stop feeling challenged by these efforts from the laity and lower ranked clergy. Indeed, the national and archdiocesan level should seek a voice and partnership with them to insure fidelity. We all love the Church. Would it not be wonderful if every Catholic became a well-informed and articulate evangelizer for the faith? Here are a few representative sites that can assist in continuing religious formation:

1917 CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA

CATHOLIC ANSWERS

CATHOLIC DICTIONARY (Fr. John Hardon)

CATHOLIC DISTANCE UNIVERSITY

CATHOLIC EDUCATION RESOURCE CENTER

CATHOLICS UNITED FOR THE FAITH

 • CATHOLIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

CATHOLIC LEAGUE

BALTIMORE CATECHISM

BIBLIA CLERUS

 • INSTITUTE OF CATHOLIC CULTURE

K OF C CATHOLIC INFORMATION SERVICE

USCCB NEW AMERICAN BIBLE

VATICAN RESOURCES (also Catechism)

Faith Formation: Use of the Archdiocesan Webpage

Sharing a few personal thoughts…

The archdiocesan webpage could become more varied and interactive. The day has long passed from when stagnant or passive pages were enough. Videos and audio talks could be stored as files for people to download. With appropriate permission, local talks or lectures could be archived. Important Masses, religious devotions and other celebrations could be covered and presented as video files. Some of this could become the media extension of The Catholic Standard as we shift away from the “paper” format. Youth pages with games and animation for children could be added. We might also include a QUESTION BOX section to the archdiocesan site where both Catholics and non-Catholics could ask questions. This dialogue could be archived for others with similar concerns. Queries could be separated under various headings, for instance just as Msgr. Peter J. Vaghi delineated in his four books:

(1) The Faith We Profess;

(2) The Sacraments We Celebrate;

(3) The Commandments We Keep; and

(4) The Prayer We Offer.

Faith Formation: Interactive Web, Music & Youth Ministry

Sharing a few personal thoughts…

We have yet to offer safe and interactive webpages for teens and children. Our Protestant brothers and sisters are also very versatile in using contemporary music styles to bring a Christian message to teens. We need to be more proactive about this and less imitative or clichéd in our attempts. Young people are physically active and emotional. Unless we can translate the faith to such terms, we run the danger of being dismissed as boring and irrelevant. I lament that our archdiocesan CYO program no longer offers a calendar of activities like dances, concerts, competition and collaboration between parish youth groups, camping and skiing weekends, monthly retreats, and so much more. The annual manual became less a catalogue of activities and more a list of legalistic things we could not do. (Some might say that I have moved here beyond education to another area of parish and archdiocesan activity; however, I would contend that they are inextricably connected.) Where is the guidance about Youth Group Meetings? Years ago when I ran a Youth Group, I prepared themes for discussion and brought in guest speakers, as from the local Pregnancy Crisis Center and the Genesis II Drug-Rehabilitation Program.

After formal catechesis in eighth grade, we must place a new emphasis upon High School level religious formation and Youth Groups. An important hurdle we face is the dilemma of a majority Catholic population trying to practice their faith with only a grade-school level understanding of their religion. Today, there is the dark joke that Confirmation is the sacrament one receives before leaving the Church. Too many are never seen again.

Faith Formation: Partnerships to Promote Faith

Sharing a few personal thoughts…

I think we need to do more with partnerships, as with the suppliers of catechetical materials but also with trusted Catholic organizations, like the Knights of Columbus. The Catholic Information Service offers wonderful booklets on the faith that could be stocked in the pamphlet racks of parishes. The incentive for the Knights would be that new and more “practical” Catholics would also constitute potential new members for their order.

A new effort for youth that shows great promise is available at https://outsidedabox.com. Their videos are short but pointed and entertaining. Given the short attention spans of youth today, it may be a way to insert the Christian message into their lives. Videos are available on YouTube.

Faith Formation: EWTN & Internet Video

Sharing a few personal thoughts…

Given that we are desirous of faith formation for all, and not just a few, we must also look both at the various methods of transmission and what forms such instructive communication might take. EWTN has encouraged viewership by mixing together religious devotions, the Mass and special dramatic programing with the general “talking-head” format. I think we can do a great deal more with teaching through drama and song. Given the cost and scope of the competition, we may have to rethink the gravity given parochial schools and converts through marriage preparation. There needs to be a shift in focus as to how we might maintain an effective presence in the public forum. When it comes to media, we need to instill in our people a greater appreciation for books and to provide literature that will inspire and move them. Music and visual media, including animation, holds great promise. And yet, as large as the Catholic Church is, her offerings are often eclipsed by the evangelical churches. The Mass for Shut-Ins depended upon gifted television time and this has largely disappeared. We may need to invest in television time (when people are awake) and in programs that will inform Catholics and maybe attract potential converts. However, this may become mute as people transition to internet television which is a cheaper option. (The problem I see at present with YouTube videos is that YouTube often attaches video links to suggested programming. Some of these attached “outside” videos are anti-Catholic and/or vulgar.)

Faith Formation: Slow to Embrace & Trust the New Media

Sharing a few personal thoughts…

The late Cardinal Hickey was acutely aware of the problems with accountability in regard to the new media. However, this also led to our slow acceptance of the internet as a forum for communication. Every word placed online supposedly passed through his office first. Indeed, it was during his tenure that Fr. John Brady’s Ministr-o-Media audio tape ministry was shut down. The archdiocesan effort was housed at the Pastoral Center and had gained a national reputation for wonderful programs about the faith, spirituality and American Catholic Church history. If the masters still exist, these are gems that might be placed online as mp3 files. The aging priest is still with us and I am sure he would be delighted to resurrect these resources.

The move to greater utilization of the internet is way overdue, but it also brings with it inherent problems of accountability. We would want to insure that anything presented has the stamp of approval of the Church. While the Church gives approbation to books, she has not caught up with how to do the same for rapid internet communications. On the other side of the equation, how can we insure that those taking online classes are indeed the ones seeking certification? Various programs for credit, as with Dayton or Catholic Distance Learning employ proxy-testing to insure that the desired learning is acquired by the designated persons.

Faith Formation: Past Use or Non-Use of the Media

Sharing a few personal thoughts…

Organizational history may be helpful in this regard. Back in the 1970’s and 80’s we saw the proliferation of video and audio resources, although quality was often dubious and much of it was neither initiated nor trusted by ecclesial authorities. Even now, many lay Catholic evangelists write and produce media for apologetic purposes with little or no official oversight. Cardinal Wuerl was one of the few American churchmen to embrace the media with his Teaching of Christ television program being a staple in certain markets for almost two decades.

The early effort of the bishops to create a satellite channel never really got off the ground and paled by comparison to independent efforts like Mother Angelica’s EWTN and the smaller private or diocesan efforts as in New Orleans and Boston. I recall attending several local meetings where directors bragged about the thousands who could watch (for a hefty fee) the round-table discussions and catechesis. However, large satellite dishes were required and recipients were often reduced to large schools and hospitals. The sad truth that we had to face was that almost no one was really watching. Millions of dollars were wasted.

The Archdiocese of Washington had an opportunity to take possession of a low-power television station back in the late 1980’s but the priest who was our communications and media director turned down the opportunity. I suspect that it entailed more work than he was prepared to render. Here was a case where instead of putting our best people on a project, the Archdiocese assigned a troubled priest who had returned to ministry after an unapproved leave-of-absence. He eventually walked away entirely from his ministry as an archdiocesan priest to pursue teaching musical theater at American University. He is now a renegade “gay” priest who regularly offers Mass at Dignity gatherings.

Faith Formation: We Need Creativity & Initiative

Sharing a few personal thoughts…

A particular challenge facing us is that a secular culture and its media is no longer either neutral or a partner in the transmission of Christian faith and morals. Our archdiocesan Church administration seeks to remedy this by a modification of a classroom or lecture approach to adult catechesis and continuing faith formation to an online and/or recorded format. This is understandable, because it is the easiest approach, and extends strained resources, but it may not be wholly effective given the widespread competition for the hearts and minds of believers. The basic change that we see in the archdiocesan effort in Washington is the increased reliance upon online resources. This is a good step, but will it be enough? Maybe we can do more than insert “talking heads” into pop-up video frames. For instance, skyping holds great promise in bringing people together in real time. We must also move away from stagnant webpages to dynamic-interactive pages. Many still treat the webpage like a piece of paper. This fails to respect the many applications and potential it holds. We must begin to think outside the proverbial box.

Would a Good God Command the Murder of Children?

BOYCE: How can God command his followers to kill children (1 Samuel) and still be the moral authority?

FATHER JOE:

“Thus says the LORD of hosts: I will punish what Amalek did to the Israelites when he barred their way as they came up from Egypt. Go, now, attack Amalek, and put under the ban everything he has. Do not spare him; kill men and women, children and infants, oxen and sheep, camels and donkeys.” (1 Samuel 15:2-3).

The Amalekites (descendants of Esau) had long been a dreaded enemy of God’s people. The curse of God against them in Exodus 17:14 was not unlike other biblical condemnations; i.e., the primordial Flood or the curse against the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. The judgment of God targets not merely individuals, but as with divine favor, the larger community. Catholicism has retained this appreciation in regard to faith; it is both personal and corporate. We are all connected. The Amalekites resented the favor that God had shown Israel.

Some critics make a modified utilitarian argument, arguing that God orders or permits such taking of human life for a greater good. In this case, it would be the survival of his Chosen People. Less convincing but not discounted is the argument that the destruction of a people is for their own good, saving the souls of children by having them die before being corrupted by sin.

What are my thoughts about this? First, all life belongs to God since he is its author. This is the pervading truth that we must understand. It is on this account that God’s taking of our life is not reckoned as evil. Second, God meets us where we are. In other words, God does not reveal himself to us all at once but in a progressive fashion, over time, and culminating in Jesus Christ. The early Jews were little different from their blood-thirsty neighbors, and yet they were the people that God had chosen for himself and from which the Messiah or Christ would emerge.

The Egyptians had employed infanticide against the Jews and Moses was spared. Herod ordered the execution of the first born of Israel, and both Jesus and John the Baptist were spared. Just as in the argument about divorce and remarriage, our Lord tries to correct that which in their “hardness of hearts” they failed to understand. When God intervenes, he does so upon the side of life and justice.

The genuine Christian sensibility, and that of most post-Holocaust Jews, will never be comfortable with certain Old Testament scenes where the Chosen People interpret their own bloodlust as part of the divine will. The psalms used in the breviary and liturgy are edited so that we might not have to bless the one who bashes children to death against the rock (Psalm 137:9). We find this attitude abhorrent, and yet, rationalizations and modern deceits based upon human selfishness and not fidelity to God would tolerate and promote the murder of millions of children annually through abortion. Here is where many of the atheistic critics of religion on this point show their hypocrisy. Catholic teaching has developed over the centuries so as to emphasize that all human life is incommensurate and that innocent life must be protected.

Another Argument About the Pope

REBECCA: Catholics claim that the Pope is the visible head of the church and “Holy Father,” “Vicar of Christ,” “Sovereign Pontiff.” All of these are titles that rightly belong only to Jesus and to God.

FATHER JOE:

Your last question was about the institution of the priesthood. Now you switch gears and attack the papacy. Evidently, your questions are not sincere but merely apologetic ploys to attack the Catholic faith.

We speak about God, particularly in the Mass, as our Father most holy. Indeed, he is thrice holy, as expressed in the Sanctus; he is the source of all holiness. The use of “Holy Father” for the Pope is no absolute usurpation of the tile. It is merely that the Church sees herself as a family and her ministers as spiritual fathers. While the Pope, as successor to St. Peter, is the visible head of the Church; the true albeit invisible headship is that of Jesus Christ. The title, “Vicar of Christ,” belongs uniquely to the Pope as it would make no sense to call Jesus his own vicar. At one time in the evolution of the title, the Pope was called the Vicar of Peter. However, in meaning, it amounted pretty much to the same thing. Christ is the Redeemer and the great Pontifex or Bridge between heaven and earth. He gives us access to the Father. The use of the word Pontiff for the Pope is an immediate connection with the “keys of the kingdom” given the chief apostle by Christ. Nothing is taken away from our Lord by the Church; but you would strip her of the leadership commissioned by Christ.

REBECCA: There is not a single instance in the Scriptures where any of the above titles are applied to a man. The term, “Holy Father” is used only once in the entire Bible, and it is used by Jesus in addressing God the Father.

FATHER JOE:

The Church was something new. Stop playing word games and look at the truth. The history of the Church did not end with the Bible; rather it began there. There is ample evidence that unique authority was given St. Peter. Matthew 16:18-19:

“And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”

When St. Paul addresses the Corinthians, he applies the title of “father” to himself: “For though you have countless guides in Christ, you do not have many fathers. I became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel” (1 Corinthians 4:15). The use of the word “holy” signifies the holiness of the papal office. The Pope is called Holy Father precisely because of the divine charge given the Church and the particular protection given the apostle by Christ. The Pope is Holy Father only because God is our Father Most Holy. The early Church called all the members of the Church by the label “saint.” The word for holy and saint is essentially the same. Because of their charge over the Eucharist and to forgive sins, priests are sometimes called, “holy fathers.”

The last bit of your comment is what you intended to say all along. You hate the Catholic Church and associate the Pope with the anti-Christ. But the false teaching is yours. You join your voice to all the worldly opposition to Christ and his Church. The devil must surely laugh that he can have you fight against the Lord to whom you claim to have faith.

REBECCA: When one searches the Bible from cover to cover, he finds only one passage which gives an indication of a vicar of Christ or God. It is 2 Thess. 2:3-4 where it says, “Let no one deceive you in any way, for the day of the Lord will not come unless the apostasy comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition, who opposes and is exalted above all that is called God, or that is worshiped, so that he sits in the temple of God and gives himself out as if he were God.”

FATHER JOE:

The Thessalonians suffered under Dionysian seers or false prophets. What is prophesied here is a certain blasphemy either of the pagan emperor or of an anti-Christ figure. The emperor wrongly claimed godhood. This is not the role of a steward or vicar. We have many shepherds who participate in the authority and service of the Good Shepherd. The Pope does not seek worship toward himself but for the one true God. Christian worship always takes note of the Lord’s Supper and the Cross.

The charge given Peter is definitive; it is reaffirmed after the resurrection when our Lord heals the chief apostle (given his recent denials) and he is again told to lead and feed the flock of Christ. This charge is passed on for as long as the Church continues in existence. Read John 21:15-19:

When they had finished breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, “Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these?” He said to him, “Yes, Lord, you know that I love you.” He said to him, “Feed my lambs.” He then said to him a second time, “Simon, son of John, do you love me?” He said to him, “Yes, Lord, you know that I love you.” He said to him, “Tend my sheep.” He said to him the third time, “Simon, son of John, do you love me?” Peter was distressed that he had said to him a third time, “Do you love me?” and he said to him, “Lord, you know everything; you know that I love you.” [Jesus] said to him, “Feed my sheep. Amen, amen, I say to you, when you were younger, you used to dress yourself and go where you wanted; but when you grow old, you will stretch out your hands, and someone else will dress you and lead you where you do not want to go.” He said this signifying by what kind of death he would glorify God. And when he had said this, he said to him, “Follow me.”