I am increasingly amazed and impressed by Msgr. Charles Pope’s expertise and the range of his wisdom on the ADW Blog. As someone who has long been intrigued by the complementarity of truth between science, philosophy and theology, I read with great interest his response to Dr. Stephen Hawking’s atheistic and mechanistic view of creation and reality. Dr. Hawking is very much in the news because he has pontificated that there need be no God and no afterlife. He suggests that religious believers are just poor people who are afraid of death. It should be noted that there is no evidence that he has studied religion with any depth and neither is he a philosopher. Dr. Hawking is a scientist. His world is that of numbers and that which can be viewed in a telescope. Msgr. Pope rightly suggests that he is no more qualified to speak on religious questions than the good priest would be to lecture on string theory. Dr. Hawking has jumped to a conclusion without sufficient study and reflection. Coincidentally, the great expert on black holes has suffered professional setbacks lately for espousing scientific opinions (within his field and about evaporating black holes and alternative dimensions) with little or no hard science to back up his claims. He looks impressive in his chair and linked to a computer and voice synthesizer, but the researcher may be slipping more and more into science fiction and fantasy. What I am trying to say is what Msgr. Pope says so much clearer than I could; Dr. Hawking is not infallible and has a personal opinion about religious faith that should not muster great weight or concern. The media treats him much in the way they reported on the late Dr. Albert Einstein– with exaggeration and almost cultic worship.
Msgr. Pope notes that the famous scientist views his brain much as a computer and that when it stops functioning, that will be the end of him. This is not so much a scientific view (as it cannot be proven) but a philosophical one. Here too Dr. Hawking is outside his area of expertise. I would also suggest that something of his fatalism is due to his personal condition. He has remarked that he feels like a brain trapped in a useless and dying body. Separatists identify the person with the mind and view it (much like a computer) in opposition to the rest of the “robotic” body. This is not a true Christian or Catholic perspective. We regard the human person as a whole and the mind is not merely “thinking meat.” The Church speaks of human beings as spiritual-corporeal-composites. The body breaks down but the soul has no parts and is immortal. God has promised us restoration of the body and soul. While it is true that some fear death, Christians also believe that love is stronger than death and place their confidence in a personal and corporate relationship with Christ. The Church proclaims that Christ is risen and that he desires to share his life with us. God has even planted a desire in us for happiness, reunion and life. This yearning is neither accidental nor capricious.
Dr. Hawking has given a heroic witness of living and working through terrible adversity. But his answer that people should live their full potential and forget about an afterlife is no real answer. It is unfortunate that a man who has pursued truth would dismiss the genuine journey of others to find ultimate meaning. If the good doctor had lived at an earlier time in history there would not have been the technology to keep him alive and to allow him to work or communicate. Others in our own time have disabilities of both the mind and body. If human life is only valued in terms of utility and there is no higher value then the recourse of people with his mindset would be a massive campaign of euthanasia and suicide. Those suffering severe retardation and in coma could not actively engage in any effort for the good life or for any potential, earthly rational or otherwise. Indeed, dissenters have argued to strip the title “human” from any entity that does not have a clearly rational potential. Does the media really understand what kind of nightmare world that Dr. Hawking’s views would create? Msgr. Pope sees these very same danger signs. Such ideas were tested before by the likes of Margaret Sanger and Adolf Hitler; ironically they would result in a eugenics that would have cost Dr. Stephen Hawking his mortal existence.
Filed under: Atheism, Catholic, Creation, Jesus, Justification, Philosophy, Pro-Life, Salvation | 2 Comments »
One of my favorite feasts and dogmas is that of the Immaculate Conception, a teaching of the Church which has had a long and sometimes controversial history. There are even some contemporary critics of this dogma of faith who would argue that it overly separates Mary from the rest of us. Certainly, it is true that sinfulness is a reality ever present in our lives. We find it so difficult to be good. It is ironic that a few of the feminist theologians who image Mary as a strong and liberated woman, would then criticize this teaching and argue that Mary has been used as a device of oppression on the part of a male dominated hierarchy. It seems to me that quite the opposite may be true. The witness of Mary as the queen of the saints would emphasize that the greatest person to ever walk the earth next to the Lord, is this woman Mary. Genesis 3:9-15, 20 recalls the first Eve who with her husband turns away from God in disobedience. Psalm 98:1,2-3,3-4 might remind us that if Eve is the mother of all the living, Mary in her faithfulness is the mother of all who are reborn in her Son. She stands as a model of holiness for men and women alike. Her preservation from sin does not create an impassible chasm between her and us. Sin by definition adds nothing to us or to her. If anything, it is a lack of something which should be there — the grace and presence of Christ. Just as she carried the Lord, now we must avoid sin so as to be filled with his presence and life. Sin is that which divides and alienates. To wish this upon Mary would mean wanting separation from her and the Lord.
Job 38:1, 12-21; 40:3-5 focuses on how small we are in comparison to the glory of God. Job is almost shamed by God who in rhetorical question after question asks if he could possibly be as great as him. Have you commanded the morning? Have you entered the sources of the sea or its abyss? Have you comprehended the breadth of the earth? “Tell me, if you know all,” God challenges him. Job, a mere human being like ourselves, came to his senses and responded, “Behold, I am of little account; what can I answer you?”
I suppose most Thomists would say that animals do not go to heaven, given that they do not possess immortal souls. This somewhat harsh response is often softened with the assertion that they are not entirely gone in that other animals (like dogs) share their substantial form. Others would say that an animal, like your favorite dog, continues to exist as an idea in the mind of God.
Blogger Priest 