Why are we suffering again with this “he said” and “he did not say” business? Did no one learn a lesson from the earlier confused ramblings of this aging atheist who interviewed the Pope soon after the election? Does no one keep reliable transcripts or recordings? I had hoped the Vatican would learn now that the left-leaning publications are not to be trusted. They want scandal and will spin anything if it gets what they want, in other words, a diminished Church and lots of publicity and sales. I can appreciate that the Pope would call sexual abuse “leprosy in our house.” That is not surprising. But did he really say there were abusers among the cardinals? I really doubt it. They would have been expunged by now. It would signify the worse possible self-recrimination. Already the Vatican is saying the statement was inaccurate. In other words, the newspaper La Repubblica is LYING! Let us call it what it is. This being the case, why should we regard any of the rest as a reliable interview with Pope Francis?
Of course the damage does not end there. The paper’s founder Eugenio Scalfari offers the article as a “reconstruction” of his one-hour conversation with the Pope. This is the day of digital recording; why must we suffer inaccurate and controversial reconstructions? The Pope is quoted as saying, “Many of my collaborators who fight with me (against pedophilia) reassure me with reliable statistics that say that the level of pedophilia in the Church is about two percent. This data should hearten me but I tell you that it does not hearten me at all. In fact, I think that it is very grave.” The world press grabbed this statement and headlines blasted across the globe that two percent of priests were pedophiles or child molesters! While he probably meant throughout the whole Church, not just the ministries, what is the basis for such an assessment? Is it the statistical average in the world population, Catholic or not? I do not recall any polling or phone calls asking about orientation or perversions. Are these just made-up numbers? Again, if we knew for sure we had potential child molesters in the ranks of the priests, why have they not been removed? Are we just guessing that they might be there given past misconduct?
People are doing the math. As of 2012, if there are some 414,000 priests then at 2%, how many pedophiles does that make? The answer is 8,280! I do not believe it. I think the figures are mere conjecture. Seminary formation would have prevented many such men from being ordained. Others have already been ousted. I would contend that most priests today are no threat to children or other people at risk.
Again the Vatican issued a warning statement that Scalfari has a habit of reconstructing interviews from memory, not recording or taking notes. Why he is one of Italy’s best known Italian journalists is beyond me. It seems to me that he is highly unreliable. The Vatican is telling us that the newspaper is seeking to “manipulate naïve readers.” If that is the case, then why talk to this anti-Catholic newspaper, anyway? It makes no sense to me. These are not our friends. Indeed, it seems that both the Church and the truth are casualties to such interviews.
When recently talking to the victims of abuse, the Holy Father rightly spoke about this as a cause for weeping and how there was a real need for reparation. He compared predator priests to the evil of cults and black Masses. He vowed zero tolerance and that bishops would be held accountable for how the dealt with charges and situations. I would add that we must also be careful not to scapegoat the Church’s ministers as wicked and dangerous men. This would do a disservice to the many saints who sacrifice everything for God and his people.
SLATE: Pope Francis Interview on Pedophilia and Celibacy in the Church
Filed under: Anti-Catholicism, Atheism, Catholic, News, Sexuality, Sin |














































(Fr.)* Joe, my wife left me 10 years ago and I havent had a woman since,
I’m wondering since I live a celibate life how long do I have to wait before I can approach a person sexually attractive to me?
I suppose you are right Father Joe. There are very few homosexual Catholic clergy and the sex abuse scandals were mostly false allegations.
Father Joe
Thanks for your reply. My cousin, Father Don Fabrizzio, tells me that many priests who report other degenerate homosexual priests are silenced by Bishops themselves. Why? The scandals are not over. Too fee priests speak out against these sexual perverts that run high postions within the Church. As far as Mr.Sipes goes, the sats he gave me are from surveys that were given to thousands of priests. 45 percent of the priests responded that they were homosexual in orientation. These numbers have nothing to do with his opinion. In discussions with other Catholics everyone I spoke with mentions that their parish priest is homosexual. How on earth they would know is beyond me but the belief is still there. When I spoke with Father Donald Cuzzons, he mentioned how many heterosexual priests leave seminaries when the stench of homosexual behaviour overwhelms them. If one were to listen to you father, one would come away that the homosexual clergy population is small indeed. Yet all the evidence is against what you say. Country after country with massive charges against homosexual clergy. 4120 US clergy alone have had charges laid against them in the last 20 years. Almost all homosexual related. Check out Wikipedia for sources under Catholic Church sex scandals and others. Also check out homosexuality in the Priesthood and various other countries as well. Most priests have lost the trust of most Catholics. You may not like to hear this but it’s true. There are some great priests but they are like diamonds in the ruff, rare. The Catholic Church has lost and is continuing to lose money since the priestly homosexual scandals became public. That is not my opinion, it is a fact. The clergy has only themselves to blame, only themselves.
Father Joe, I like you a lot. That’s why I am honest when I write to you. You say you have been a priest for a long time. Excellent. Try stepping outside and seeing things from your parishioners point of view. Priests will protect themselves and their bishops at all costs. When many Bishops all across the world were shuffling gay peadophile priests from parish to parish, who were they protecting. The children. That was the last things on their minds. They were protecting gay priests who committed crimes. Yes there are many good priests, yes you may be one of them. But our church paid over $2 billion dollars out in compensation in the US alone to abused boys. Father Joe, I’m no layman here, my first cousin is a priest in the Vatican. Don Fabrizzio Colonna-Turriziani. He is stationed sometimes in the Vatican and sometimes in Frosinone. Homosexuality in the priesthood is a grave problem. You don’t beleive it. Leave your parish and visit our churches headquarters. Stay a while and then someone there might fill you in. Visit my cousin, he might even tell you. I have recently spoken with Richard Sipes and his facts are that 45 percent of priests are homosexual, not 25 percent as you say. I find it ironic that this very so called celibate clergy that teaches heterosexual men how to have sex with their wives is for a large part, made up of homosexual degenerates. Degenerates that have humiliated the good works of Catholics around the world. Degenerates that have played right into the hands of lefty abortion idiots. You mentioned that if a priest is homosexual and celibate that is OK. So if all Catholic clergy were homosexual and celibate that would be OK with you. Homosexuals support homosexuality. They think there is nothing wrong with their behaviour. Is this the clergy the Catholics would support? I think not. Also, let’s talk money. As mentioned above, the Catholic Church in the US alone, forked out 2 billion dollars in compensation to boys who were molested by priests and bishops. The Church in the USA, Canada and other countries has lost a lot of money that is normally donated to it by Catholic parishioners. Why do you think Pope Benedict retired. The bad press his leadership was having around the world was costing the Church too much money. Yes Father, it’s about money. Bottom line is that many decent parishioners are too embaarassed to tell their local priests what they think. Sweep everything under the rug. I am not a protestant or orthodox. I was born Catholic and will die a Catholic. I am repusled and disgusted to no end at the homosexual invasion in the Church. Not a small infiltration but an avalanche of degenerate priests bent on destroying the Church.
E:
All internal stats show that between 30-60 percent of priests have homosexual proclivities.
FATHER JOE:
E:
You denied this in the past because most of the priests you know are straight. Your famous reply was, “How do you know this?”
FATHER JOE:
E:
I have already sent you the sources in a previous email. The sources are all Catholic. Read Father Donald Cuzzons books on this subject.
FATHER JOE:
E:
The lefties do not like to broach this subject because they adore homosexuality in all its degenerate colors. But the fact remains that homosexuals love males, adult and young.
The Gay Pride parades that they have in major cities in North America used to have The North American Man Boy Association (NAMBLA) in their parades. Due to pressure from parents groups the homosexuals decided that NAMLA could no longer be part of their parades.
The more homosexuals you have, the more abuse of boys you will have.
A crazy and disproportionate amount of priests are homosexual.
FATHER JOE:
E:
Put children in front of them and look out. Homosexuals cannot control themselves. Sex is everything to them.
FATHER JOE:
E:
I mentioned this to you before and you were in denial again.
FATHER JOE:
E:
The Vatican is full of nude men to the point that you will have to look long and hard to find any nude females.
FATHER JOE:
E:
The last time I mentioned this you replied, “The Church is not prudish and is not offended by the human body.” Yes Father, the Church and its male hierarchy is not prudish at all. But why does all that art have to be of naked men with their male genitals fully exposed. Many statues and paintings are of male saints, and many are nude. Who in their right mind would like to see a naked saint or a great Jewish prophet with their penis and testicles for the whole world to see? Is that something we would love to show Jesus? And the art is almost all of nude men. Men, men, men, everywhere you look.
FATHER JOE:
E:
If I entered a priest’s house and I saw nothing but nude male art everywhere what does that tell me about this priest.
FATHER JOE:
E:
Deny all you want father but homosexuality is a huge part of the priesthood.
FATHER JOE: