justice | Blogger Priest

Where is the Justice?

Posted on December 4, 2025 by Father Joe

Maybe I am handicapped by chronic cynicism? But I am often wary of those who criticize others about how they understand justice when their own appreciation would likely not muster close inspection. The word “justice” like “love” and “rights” has been hackneyed in every possible way, as well as assumed into the ranting politics of left, right and all stances in-between. The Black Lives movement clamors for justice against racism and power. Radical feminists define justice as liberation, not only from males but from their own biology and fertility. Militant Zionists demand a justice for past Jewish martyrs with a retributive justice hard to distinguish from revenge. Marxists demand a one-sided variation of justice reminiscent of Robin Hood, where the people “rise up” to steal from the rich (the bourgeoisie) and give to the poor workers (the proletariat). [In practice a party dictator takes power and all bets about justice are off the table.] While American citizens can rightly demand border security, what becomes of justice without sufficient compassion or mercy, particularly when the poor and the persecuted are lumped with criminals and the gangs from drug cartels? Can a society justly take the lives of the guilty in capital punishment when it wrongly strips the innocent unborn of any right to life? [The late Pope John Paul II said “no,” that any jurisdiction to deprive another of life under the banner of justice is forfeited in a culture of death.]

It is hard for a civilization to appreciate the cardinal virtue of justice when it is saturated with a parade of vices. While quick to judge, many people literally do not know what it means to be good or what constitutes the “right thing.” I suspect that is why we see the vast multiplication of surveillance cameras. Increasing numbers of people feel it is okay to steal, so long as they are not caught. Intimidation has replaced the virtues.

What do we as human beings have coming to us and what is “due” or owed to others? This varies from person to person. Business and general exchange of services relates to commutative justice. The employer should pay his employee an adequate wage. The employee needs to be diligent in providing serves or goods for which he or she is remunerated. Distributive justice is directed toward our relationship with a community. We all have equal rights to the same freedoms and general opportunities. But we do not all have the same resources, talents or obligations. This form of justice respects proportionality. Each person in a society does his or her part for the whole. Finally, there is what we call social justice. Here we often find a conflict between legal definitions and what we regard as just according to both divine positive law and natural law.

Turning to the Church, we need to cease mimicking the polarity that we find in partisan civil politics. Otherwise, we violate the peace of Christ that we celebrate at the Eucharist. This peace is focused upon our unity in Jesus Christ. How can we possibly appeal to those outside the Church for either evangelization or for social justice while our own believers are at each other’s throats in divergence from one another. We should not compromise the Gospel of Life by making too little of abortion or making too much of capital punishment. There need be no conflict about preserving secure borders and in proportional justice to illegals, distinguishing between desperate families who love the promise of America and the criminal invaders who should be expelled or punished. Neither side should use the justice system to attack political enemies. All should demonstrate a religious respect for the Holy Father, instead of a nasty knee-jerk criticism about the role of women, gays, environmental stewardship or various liturgical concerns. I really hate the current politicization of faith. We should not be quick to judge or condemn the Catholic character of men and women who voted either for Harris or Trump or someone else in the last election. Neither candidate articulates nor manifests the full kerygma as we understand it. No Catholic should allow his or her party platform or agenda to supplant the demands of the Gospel. The moral values of the Gospel are what they are. We should all seek to be good Catholics, keeping the commandments and loving God and our neighbor. We should exhibit a modicum of human respect, even when differences of opinion are severe. This must be the stance from both authority and from the rank-and-file. We need to be contrite about past ridicule and careful not to mock others or to use incendiary language. It is far better to build bridges than to burn them down.

Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: Bible, christianity, Church, conservatism, dissent, Faith, God, Jesus, justice, left-wing, liberalism, right-wing, virtues | Leave a comment »

We are Not All Judged the Same

Posted on July 29, 2025 by Father Joe

While we tend to give the emphasis to human freedom and choice; God’s justice and mercy also hinges upon divine election. This is not fate or a crude Calvinism where God hates sinners and predestines them to hell. St. Augustine would speak of the just being predestined to glory. How it works remains a mystery. But we trust that God is good and his justice is fair and right.

When it comes to the matter of justification before God, many might compare themselves to others but with a smug confidence in their superior standing. That is just not how divine judgment works. Mindful of the parable about the pharisee and the publican (Luke 18:10-14), we are not saved in isolation from those around us.

The believer must care about the spiritual status of those around him, particularly those who are his charges. Giving scandal to the faith or bringing harm to the “little ones” can be particularly damning. Indifference to the poor and the oppressed brings harsh judgment upon those who might ordinarily be viewed as pious or devout (Mark 9:42).

The realm of mortal sin includes both the violation of the laws of God and precepts of the Church, as well as the commission of acts that are always and everywhere objectively wrong. Following the testimony of Scripture, there are both mortal and venial sins, depending upon the severity of the objective matter. However, the gravity of sin is also a subjective issue. If one is ignorant of a wrong then one cannot be guilty of its commission. Those who have not reached the age of reason cannot sin. Those who are delusional or have suffered the loss of reasoning are likewise no longer culpable for what they do. Also, one cannot accidentally commit sin. By definition, sin requires both an objective wrong, awareness of its severity, and free volition in its commission.

The teachings of Pope Francis about spiritual accompaniment have stirred much soul searching. As a community of faith it makes sense that we must journey with one another. Those in ministry have a sacred duty to walk with others. But I have become increasingly troubled by the commentary about this accompaniment. It seems nonsensical that we might remain silent about wrongs or about the deadly threat of perdition. True love would save souls, not just make people feel better about living in sin. Those in irregular unions, i.e. adulterous second bonds, may attend Mass, care for their households and nurture their children. But can we dismiss the warning of Christ about divorce? Serious sin can be tender and caring, but it is still wrong. Why do we focus on the replacement family and so often forget about the abandoned spouse and children? We should rightly urge annulments when there are obvious grounds and prospects of healing for messy situations; but we must not be presumptuous about the invalidity of broken bonds or the positive status of subsequent unions. I well understand how our hearts can go out to those in same-sex unions, particulaly when they are faithful in church attendance and toward one another; but can we really indirectly affirm or even remain quiet about a sin that Scripture deplores as most deadly? St. Paul lists it among the sexual sins that forfeit one’s place in the kingdom (Romans 1:26-32). We can affirm love but not sin. We can expand the meaning of family but never in a way that undermines the plan of God in marriage between one man and one woman that is open to the generation of new human life. Again, accompaniment is important, but what if we are walking in the wrong direction? Do we go to hell for friendship sake? That is not true solidarity. It could also happen that sinners wrong in conscience might be judged lightly, while those who knew better but withheld correction, might find themselves damned. The more one is given, the more for which one is accountable. Indeed, two might commit the same sin, but because of subjective liability, one earns purgation and heaven and another merits hell. As I said, judgment is real but it is not always clear and simple. Deathbed repentence and conversion is possible. A priest has the power to steal a soul from Satan even at the last moment of mortal life.

Ringleader, henchmen, or bystander, Christ can save whom he wills. How will God judge those who lead others into sin? Enablers and accomplices are also guilty of sin. We need to model the faith and life of a Christian disciple and walk the road trod before us by the saints. If we want heaven then we must witness to Christ and his Church. Silence or embarrassment about Christ is deadly.