• Our Blogger

    Fr. Joseph Jenkins

  • The blog header depicts an important and yet mis-understood New Testament scene, Jesus flogging the money-changers out of the temple. I selected it because the faith that gives us consolation can also make us very uncomfortable. Both Divine Mercy and Divine Justice meet in Jesus. Priests are ministers of reconciliation, but never at the cost of truth. In or out of season, we must be courageous in preaching and living out the Gospel of Life. The title of my blog is a play on words, not Flogger Priest but Blogger Priest.

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Anonymous's avatarAnonymous on Ask a Priest
    Michael J's avatarMichael J on Ask a Priest
    Jeremy Kok's avatarJeremy Kok on Ask a Priest
    Mike Zias's avatarMike Zias on Ask a Priest
    Jeremy Kok's avatarJeremy Kok on Ask a Priest

Our Understanding of Hell

The traditional view of hell in Scripture and in Church teaching reluctantly admits that most people will suffer perdition. There is a universal call to salvation but that does not mean that everyone will be saved. Heaven is the ultimate sign of God’s love which we must share and return. Purgatory is an expression of God’s mercy for those who love the Lord but not as they should. Hell is proof of God’s justice where goodness is rewarded and evil is punished. There is a particular judgment at the end of life and a final judgment at the consummation of all things.   The damned in hell are alive and conscious. They are not asleep and they have not passed out of existence. The soul is immortal. It has no parts to break down. The suffering of hell is due to their awareness. Primarily, they are alienated from the God for whom they were made. Secondarily, hell is a place where there is punishment or pain to the senses. This torment is defined as fire, both literally and spiritually. It is a fire that torments but is incapable of consuming us. Hell is forever. There is no respite or escape. The literary reflection of Dante would suggest that there are circles or variations of hell based upon one’s spiritual state at death. While God’s providence cannot be thwarted and he saves whom he wills, this is understood as an election to glory. Catholicism does not teach that any are stamped as damned from the very beginning of their life-story. Rather, we get what we want. It comes down to our cooperation or lack of it with divine grace. Our emphasis is upon human freedom or choice. Not to be confused with hell is purgatory, a temporary abode (where those in venial sin or suffering from temporal punishment due to sin) can be purified or perfected by the fire of God’s love prior to entry into heaven.         

Sin, Judgment & Perdition

It is true that both the virtuous and the vile must wrestle with sin. Christ is what gives us the edge against the devil. The natural man has to make the best of the fight while inhibited by ignorance, impeded by Satan and lacking any supernatural protection. The fallen-away believer forfeits his alliance with heaven and shuns the one who desperately wants to save him. It is the new man, born again by grace into the likeness of Christ who can vanquish the devil and know reconciliation and peace in the Lord.  Christ’s victory is our victory. 

I cannot say how often I have heard a parent regret an adult child’s defection and apostasy. And yet, almost in the same breath, they take consolation that at least he or she still believes in Jesus or goes to a Protestant church or at the bare minimal, is a nice person. But there is no Gospel of Nice. We cannot get to heaven on our own.  While this will upset many, I suspect there is a “nice” section to hell, where maybe the flame is not quite so hot and the demons have padded pitchforks. A lapsed Catholic might still believe in “Jesus” but is he the real Messiah, the Christ that comes to us in the Eucharist? No, I suspect it is the caricature of Christ that one might get from movies or a popular but immature recollection of faith.  That cannot save us either.  As for those who find fellowship in Protestant churches, some which feign being non-denominational, there is no denying that there are elements of the Catholic faith purloined by these confessions. But while some solace and benefit might come to non-Catholics, those who were baptized Catholic will be kept to a higher standard and will be judged as Catholics.  If missing even one Mass is a mortal sin that damns a soul for eternity, then how about those who have missed hundreds or thousands of Sunday Masses. No deprecation of ecumenism intended, a faith-fellowship juice and cracker meal cannot compare with the Catholic precious body and blood of our Lord in the Eucharist.  If I sound fatalistic I am sorry. God can save whom he wills.  But this does not mean that he will necessarily save all those we desperately desire he would save.    

Those who count themselves as friends to Christ would have others join their company. They share something of the Lord’s desperation or burning desire for the salvation of souls. They take delight in being instruments of God.  They find satisfaction at the sight of sinners on bended knee, contrite and repentant for the wrongs they have committed. They invite the prodigal and reformed reprobate to join them in praising God.  Together, they walk hand-in-hand in keeping the commandments. But no matter how hard they try, there are some who will not listen. Indeed, they reject both the message and the messenger (Matthew 23:33-34). This is the legacy of prophets and missionaries. Ears are closed to what they do not want to hear. Voices are silenced. Martyrs are convicted for the crime of believing and urging others to faith. Some face trumped up charges for the sins of others, like the late Cardinal Pell. Reputations are destroyed and preachers are ridiculed as hypocrites. It is not simply that the Gospel finds rejection; there is a dark agency seeking to thwart the Word of God. We battle not just human ignorance and weakness but spiritual powers and principalities.  It is not enough that there are those who would damn themselves; they desire to take others down with them.

The Blight of Atheism

Atheism is regarded as a sin against faith. It is not simply a matter of one not finding the evidence for God as intellectually satisfying; rather, it is an active impediment to credulity. It signifies a spiritual drought. Worst yet, it might be compared to the locusts that swarm to consume the awaited harvest. Rather than trusting in God’s providence and intervention, atheists lament that all their hard work is quickly undone. Their toil is in vain. The lack of lasting meaning tempts them to despair.

When it comes to Jesus, the disciple must possess a readiness to believe. The ground of the soul must be prepared as fertile and receptive for the seed. The crop must be watered by instruction, witness and grace. There is no naïve gullibility but rather an honesty in intellect and a willingness in consent. Jesus is the fulfillment of prophecy. He is the long-awaited Messiah (John 8:24-28). He confirms his power and identity by performing miracles. A claim is made for divinity by his acts of mercy. Only God can forgive sins.  He raises the dead. God alone is the author of life.  He walks on water. He is the God of nature or creation. The great precursor and prophet, John the Baptist, attests to who he is and to his mission. The hearts of believers, past and present, are burning with the truth.  Only those who are spiritually cold, not wanting to believe, are the ones to reject him and his message.  Hundreds will witness the aftermath of his revivification. The apostles who celebrate his victory over the grave will testify to his resurrection by their constant preaching and martyrdom. What sane person would die for a lie? No one! A refusal to believe constitutes a rejection of grace. Saving faith is made real not just in the mind but in the heart. 

The greatest remedy to atheism is the Eucharist. Along with the Word, it is the food that satisfies for the hunger of the soul. Non-believers go hungry. Those who deny the Eucharistic Christ are spiritually malnourished, starving for meaning and the life of grace. Believers become one with this Eucharist, part of the harvest of faith.

Salvation in Christ as the Light of the World

When it comes to salvation, the excuse of ignorance forfeits much of its weight after the incarnation. The covenant that God first forges is with a select people and much of the rest of the world is left in the dark about the true God. It is only with the coming of Christ that the covenant is expanded and consummated to include all who would believe in the Jewish Messiah. Membership among the elect is now not determined by blood and circumcision but by faith and baptism. Our Lord, who is the Light of the world, does not expose himself all at once but over time and in degrees.  This Light first emerges as a glimmering promise to an insignificant family and tribe. Later, having prepared a people for himself, we have the first of several theophanies. It is in the Epiphany with the wise men or kings that the Light is revealed as having entered the world. It will become the Light to the nations.  And yet, the hidden years of Christ conceal much of this illumination until the final three years of our Lord’s life and the instigation of his public ministry.  What he does during these final years will set the pattern for his apostles and for all who would evangelize. No longer would this Light be hidden. Indeed, Jesus as the burning paschal candle will sacrifice himself for all who would believe and love him.

The daybreak of Christ dispels the long night brought about by the devil and disobedience. Sin unleashes a storm of suffering and death upon the world. Christ institutes his  Church as a vehicle for his shining justification. The community of faith functions as a lighthouse, guiding wayfarers to safety lest they shipwreck against the rocks of ignorance, fear and hatred. The mission of the Church is always the same, to herald Jesus as the Light of Salvation. Jesus tells his listeners,

“You are the light of the world. A city set on a mountain cannot be hidden. Nor do they light a lamp and then put it under a bushel basket; it is set on a lampstand, where it gives light to all in the house. Just so, your light must shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your heavenly Father” (Matthew 5:14-16).

We can speak of “light” as something identified with our Lord and shared with his Church, allowing us to see or penetrate the darkness. What happens if a light is too brilliant and the eyes to the soul are not calibrated to bear its intensity? Like looking at the sun, our eyes might close or face blindness. Others do not like what they see and thus they turn their gaze. Do we really want to see God? Can we bear to see ourselves as we truly are, with all our sins and weaknesses, or do we shun the light?

The wicked are often not forthright with the truth. They may even count on others as not being disposed and ready to hear it. I am reminded of the actor Jack Nicholson as Colonel Jessep, when being questioned on the stand in the movie, A FEW GOOD MEN. A marine has died and a coverup ensues. He angrily responds to the prosecutor, “You can’t handle the truth!” The truth convicts the guilty but it often overwhelms the innocent. As for the saints, they see God— both within and before them. The light always brings with it a verdict (John 3:19-21).

We are Not All Judged the Same

While we tend to give the emphasis to human freedom and choice; God’s justice and mercy also hinges upon divine election. This is not fate or a crude Calvinism where God hates sinners and predestines them to hell. St. Augustine would speak of the just being predestined to glory. How it works remains a mystery. But we trust that God is good and his justice is fair and right.

When it comes to the matter of justification before God, many might compare themselves to others but with a smug confidence in their superior standing. That is just not how divine judgment works. Mindful of the parable about the pharisee and the publican (Luke 18:10-14), we are not saved in isolation from those around us.

The believer must care about the spiritual status of those around him, particularly those who are his charges. Giving scandal to the faith or bringing harm to the “little ones” can be particularly damning. Indifference to the poor and the oppressed brings harsh judgment upon those who might ordinarily be viewed as pious or devout (Mark 9:42). 

The realm of mortal sin includes both the violation of the laws of God and precepts of the Church, as well as the commission of acts that are always and everywhere objectively wrong. Following the testimony of Scripture, there are both mortal and venial sins, depending upon the severity of the objective matter. However, the gravity of sin is also a subjective issue.  If one is ignorant of a wrong then one cannot be guilty of its commission. Those who have not reached the age of reason cannot sin. Those who are delusional or have suffered the loss of reasoning are likewise no longer culpable for what they do. Also, one cannot accidentally commit sin. By definition, sin requires both an objective wrong, awareness of its severity, and free volition in its commission.     

The teachings of Pope Francis about spiritual accompaniment have stirred much soul searching. As a community of faith it makes sense that we must journey with one another. Those in ministry have a sacred duty to walk with others. But I have become increasingly troubled by the commentary about this accompaniment. It seems nonsensical that we might remain silent about wrongs or about the deadly threat of perdition. True love would save souls, not just make people feel better about living in sin. Those in irregular unions, i.e. adulterous second bonds, may attend Mass, care for their households and nurture their children. But can we dismiss the warning of Christ about divorce? Serious sin can be tender and caring, but it is still wrong. Why do we focus on the replacement family and so often forget about the abandoned spouse and children? We should rightly urge annulments when there are obvious grounds and prospects of healing for messy situations; but we must not be presumptuous about the invalidity of broken bonds or the positive status of subsequent unions. I well understand how our hearts can go out to those in same-sex unions, particulaly when they are faithful in church attendance and toward one another; but can we really indirectly affirm or even remain quiet about a sin that Scripture deplores as most deadly? St. Paul lists it among the sexual sins that forfeit one’s place in the kingdom (Romans 1:26-32). We can affirm love but not sin.  We can expand the meaning of family but never in a way that undermines the plan of God in marriage between one man and one woman that is open to the generation of new human life. Again, accompaniment is important, but what if we are walking in the wrong direction? Do we go to hell for friendship sake? That is not true solidarity.  It could also happen that sinners wrong in conscience might be judged lightly, while those who knew better but withheld correction, might find themselves damned. The more one is given, the more for which one is accountable. Indeed, two might commit the same sin, but because of subjective liability, one earns purgation and heaven and another merits hell.  As I said, judgment is real but it is not always clear and simple. Deathbed repentence and conversion is possible. A priest has the power to steal a soul from Satan even at the last moment of mortal life.

Ringleader, henchmen, or bystander, Christ can save whom he wills. How will God judge those who lead others into sin? Enablers and accomplices are also guilty of sin. We need to model the faith and life of a Christian disciple and walk the road trod before us by the saints. If we want heaven then we must witness to Christ and his Church. Silence or embarrassment about Christ is deadly.

  • Do we routinely curse and take God’s name in vain?
  • Do we neglect the Mass and the community of faith?
  • Have we placed idols before God in our life?
  • Are our families neglected or parents forgotten?
  • Are children baptized and raised in the faith?
  • Do we routinely tell lies and violate the truth?
  • Have we received stolen goods?
  • Are we culpable for supporting abortion?
  • Have we compelled the use of contraception?
  • Do we excuse fornication and cohabitation?
  • Have we respected and been faithful to marriage bonds?
  • Have we applauded same-sex unions?
  • Has immodest dress or flirtation led others into sin?
  • Do we patronize blasphemous and lewd media?
  • Have we neglected the confession of sin and pardon?

The Reciprocity of Mercy

Matthew 6:14-15 echoes the admonition in the Lord’s Prayer that we will be forgiven by God just as we forgive others. Charity and mercy are the keys to the door of heaven. But it must be properly understood. I have heard ministers preach upon this subject in a wrong-headed manner.  It is not a bargaining with God.  We have nothing with which we can bargain.  Salvation is always a gift and cannot be merited apart from Christ.  The secret is not in the deal but with transformation.  If we forgive as Christ does then the Father will recognize his Son in us.  Jesus pleads for us on the Cross, asking the Father to forgive us as sinners, arguing that we really do not know what we are doing. Jesus dies not for the innocent but for the guilty.  If we want to take advantage of this mercy then we must imitate Jesus. That is how we show that we are kindred to him, related on a spiritual level as brothers and sisters to Christ, adopted sons and daughters of the Father. It is by giving away mercy that we make room in our hearts for receiving the pardon and saving grace of God.

We think too much of the body and too little about the soul.  Luke 12:4-5 warns us to fear the one who has the authority to cast souls into hell. St. Paul in 2 Corinthians 5:9-10 reminds us that no one properly has this power other than Christ, not evil men, not even the devil. We wrongly shy away from the Fear of the Lord, which is a gift of the Holy Spirit. But Jesus is both the Divine Mercy and the Divine Justice.  He is the judge of all. I suspect that redefining Fear of the Lord as Awe or Reverence tends to diminish something of the fear and trembling that should normally characterize the approach of a finite creature to the judging gaze of almighty God. It is true that God is all good but the problem is that we are often far from this goodness. This fearfulness is not just about who God is but about who we have failed to become. Many seem to have no shame about their iniquity and weakness. Few go to confession because there is a lack of contrition or sorrow for sin. We must not be precipitous of divine mercy or take the gifts that God offers for granted. 

If we do not love God sufficiently to avoid offending him then we should at least fear the loss of heaven and the pains of hell. Ultimately God gives us what we truly want.  Regrettably, we can compromise ourselves. Many display cowardice to evil men and submit to their intimidation. Many cower in facing the devil and wrongly give him power over them.  Weak believers have literally laid down their shields, armor and weapons in the face of the legions of hell. All must be urged to take them up. We have the sacraments! We have the saving Word! We have the communion of the saints! We have the mystery of the Church! We can have in abundance the saving grace that the devil has forfeited! We must not forget that we are a parable people who follow a parable Savior.  Jesus turns weakness and death into strength and life.  He turns his defeat into his great victory.    

Our Lord’s admonition to his friends, “Be not afraid,” should be clarified. It is first a necessary declaration given the surprise of his resurrection. Next, while Jesus would not have his disciples take light of the earthly and spiritual perils that face them; he is telling them that if they follow him, even to the Cross, they need not be afraid, because he has won the great victory. If we truly love the Lord, acknowledging with regret how our sins sent him to his passion and the Cross, then we can approach our Judge, the risen Christ, with hope and courage. If we have failed to love the Lord as we should, and have only imperfect contrition, then we have every reason to fear punishment, either temporarily in purgatory or even worse, eternally in hell. While Fear of the Lord can be saving, fear of the devil signals a deficiency in faith.    

We Trust the Promise but Must Wait for Details

 

The dynamics of the kingdom are nothing like those of the world around us. Many who pride themselves as believers have been seduced by the unholy trinity: the world, the flesh and the devil. The world is greedy for wealth and power. Flesh desires pleasure and reduces “persons” to commodities. Satan is all about bondage and broken promises. There can be no doubt that this is what the damned substitute in hell for the true Trinity that raises up the poor and the weak, that seeks a lasting joy for all who are saved, that trusts in the promises of Christ and finds freedom in his everlasting covenant.

While lacking a practical guidebook to the afterlife, we can surmise a few aspects. Heaven is not an abode of bored angels playing harps on clouds. It is not a place where selfish dreams come true. While we are left with questions, we are told that the saints see God and that this beatific vision is an occasion for completion and peace in themselves while the focus will always be giving glory to the one triune God. There is a profound unity in the Lord. The divine mystery cannot be exhausted by finite creatures. But we will be one in Christ.  We will be happy. There will be no more sorrow, sickness, pain or dying. All tears will be wiped away.  We may not understand what it means, but there will be a new heaven and a new earth.  Everything good that the world takes away will be given back to us in Christ.  We will be in our true home.    

We have been warned about hell, but it is unlikely that it will be exactly like the poets Dante and Milton described. What can we say about it? Many sources agree upon the component of fire, but while it is mesmerizing and torturous, it is more blinding than a light for true illumination. If heaven is where we find the light inside, then as Jesus described, hell is the “outer darkness.” The worst element of perdition is a forever alienation from the God that made us for himself. We will be always incomplete, frustrated in terms of our “final end.” It is a place of punishment for wrong, and along with this, of both pain or suffering to the senses and in the human spirit. The last element is the decisiveness of hell as there can be no escape. It is forever.  Will the demons delight in abusing the damned? Despite the distraction of fire, will there be rational discourse in hell? Or will each soul be placed in a perpetual solitary confinement? It is certain that there is no communion of saints in hell. But what might be the parameters for associations or a community of the damned? Are all their relationships, by definition, parasitical? Just as not all saints are identical, cannot the same be argued for the damned? Even in this world we make distinctions about criminals. Would serial killers be lumped with those who occasionally missed Mass?  While more theory than fact, it seemed to me that the limbo of the innocents was really more a suburb of hell than an abode on the fringes of heaven. It would appear likely that divine justice would treat differently those who did not know God from those who failed to love him as they should, through hatred or indifference. What quality of charity for a neighbor might spare one from the harshest elements of perdition? The mystery here is the question of salvation itself. Hell is real and terrible, but we do not know for sure who is there now and who will join them for eternity. Should we even speak of hell as a single place or as many places outside the boundaries of Christ’s kingdom?

I have wondered about the connection, if any, between dreaming and the afterlife. Dreams often reflect our concerns and anxieties about what awaits us after death. Given how I can remember very little while awake, I am amazed at the details and the worlds created in my head when sleeping. Places are fashioned that I have no conscious recognition of ever visiting. Books on shelves have real titles and there is text inside to read. This strikes me as bordering the paranormal. What is to be made of this? Often, I am oblivious to the dream, just accepting as reality the setting around me. While heaven and hell are real places, might the soul that is translated to the next world still have this capacity to create worlds within itself? If not heaven, might such an ability provide a small delusional refuge for the damned soul facing the utter terror of hell. I cannot say for sure, but I would not be surprised. Further, might there be a connection or parallel between the phantasms of the mind and the place that is prepared for us— between the virtual and the real?

The prospect of heaven or hell looms before every man and woman. Death signifies the most significant of personal transformations. It signals an awakening or a change of perspective about what matters. Too many squander their time and opportunities. Non-believers would argue that dreams have no connection with literal experiences. Dreaming allows the brain to process the questions, concerns and fears of the day. Believers would point to the two Joseph’s, one the interpreter of dreams and steward for Pharoah, and the other the foster father of Christ given messages from an angel. Dreams can be portals to the spiritual and reflect real communication with the kingdom. They can alert us to the apocalyptic and to what awaits us.   

A War Between Two Kingdoms

The world around us would replace Christian virtues with secular ones.  While tolerance is arguably a subcategory of justice, contemporary humanism would redefine it as an overriding permissiveness to a whole host of evils. Christianity cannot be tolerant of moral evil. Indeed, real Christianity makes moral judgments, seeks repentance and conversion, and amendment of life. A false Christianity would buy into the mentality of gross toleration.  But the assertion that no judgments are made is a deceit. Any who would judge as God does or against the grain of selfishness would themselves face a negative judgment. The joke about this is that everything is tolerated except another’s intolerance. The tables are turned by those cohabitating in sin, living in adultery or pursuing intimate same sex unions. “Who are you to judge me! How dare you be so intolerant and backward? All we are doing is loving each other!”

Of course, such a stance makes moral life subjective. Life and behavior are not under human whims but must comply with both divine positive law and natural law. Neither liberal politicians nor progressive churchmen can substitute their statutes for those of the historical Gospel. When such people want to argue with me, I explain that their grievance is not with me but with God. They are essentially saying that God is at fault, that the Almighty has no right to judge them or to make demands.       

As Catholics we are obliged to render human respect, but this does not mandate surrendering our basic principles.  We can love others without embracing or enabling their sins. Those who act as if they were ashamed of Jesus Christ, failing to witness and to testify to the Lord, are doing no one any favors. Instead of promoting civility they are exhibiting cowardice. Believers should be willing to suffer persecution, imprisonment and martyrdom for the Gospel.  It is an odd situation when the sinner is tolerated, and the would-be saint is oppressed. While much dissent comes from the left, the right is also guilty, as with the philosophy and cult around Ayn Rand. While an anti-communist, she was virulently anti-religion. Her popular philosophy of selfishness and a stark individualism stands in diametrical opposition to the communion of the Church and charity admonished by Christ. Religious liberty in the United States helps to preserve the place of the Church and the faith in society; however, it also makes room for competing creeds and contrary messages.

The reason why some states like Communist China persecute and manipulate the Church is because it sees Catholicism as a threat. While we might argue otherwise, insisting that believers make the best citizens, in truth the Church is dangerous.  The Church and her message about justice and human dignity make her a threat to those states aligned with the principles of hell. Yes, the cosmic confrontation also has terrestrial allies. Despite propaganda, threats, imprisonment and executions— faith communities are hard to silence and neutralize. Communist China is intimidated by symbols like the cross. Lately there has been a campaign to remove crosses from churches. When possible, the churches themselves are bulldozed. There is a competition for souls. While it takes a different form, the tension is taking place in the Western world, too. The Marxist atheist and the Secular humanist are kindred spirits. The existence of God would not only be inconvenient but would place their materialistic objectives in peril. The battle is for hearts and minds. The devil is never more effective than when he is hidden from sight, presumed as a fairy tale without real existence.

I well recall the Solidarity movement in Poland during a time when a Polish Pope had been elected in Rome. What was happening in the Eastern bloc countries was thought impossible. Strides were being made for truth and freedom. The news recollected Stalin asking a mocking question of Churchill after the war, “How many divisions does the Roman Pope have?” Given time, the joke was on him, for the Pope evidently had enough. Not all wars are won with guns and bombs. Some victories come with trust in God and a willingness to take up the cross and follow the Lord.

Christian faith and values are often quite personal, but they are also communal and never private. Modern secularists assume that religion is merely a false superstition. Increasingly militant, they are forcing believers and their God out of the public forum. Sadly, if God is removed then there is no protection from those who have usurped the Lord as the chief lawgiver. Politicians make themselves into gods, lawyers become their priests, and the police are made the muscle to keep everyone in line. Media personalities and public-school teachers make possible the necessary indoctrination.  By contrast, the Church does not indoctrinate but seeks to inform free men and women with the truths that come from God. Conversion and faith are the work of the Holy Spirit. Saints and the damned are fashioned in this world, not the next. Even though they may be unaware, all are being prepared for eternity, for heaven or hell. The demarcation as to which side we might be on is made possible by asking pertinent questions of ourselves. Are there certain truths that are immutable or are all things relative or subjective? Are all people regarded as having an incommensurate value as “persons” or do some matter more than others? Is human life sacred or are some judged as expendable?  Anything that undermines human dignity and the sanctity of life is not from God. Human rights and freedoms are cherished by the Church and believers. The commandments reflect the mind of God and our nature as men and women. Any license to sin is not a nod to true freedom but rather its misuse and the derogation of human dignity. When we fail to think with the mind of Christ and his Church, we compromise the Gospel. We begin believing something other than the Christian faith. Reflecting upon such matters can enlighten us as to whether we are walking toward the kingdom of God or to the fiery trash heap of Gehenna.

The Taint of Sin is a Taste of Hell

When we compromise with sin or fail to acknowledge its damaging gravity over us, we are not simply tempting fate but attempting to spurn the providence of God. We are literally daring God to save us despite ourselves. This makes us kindred spirits with Judas who likely thought that a forced confrontation would speed the messianic confrontation with the Romans and a corrupt Jewish leadership. Given his close association with Jesus, it is unlikely that he acted purely from greed. He despairs when he realizes that he has been an agent for Satan in getting his master tortured and murdered. Lacking supernatural faith, he finds himself alienated from the other apostles and stripped of hope. The throngs he expected to rise as an army of the righteous proclaiming their hosannas, shouted “crucify him” instead. If the devil could not claim Jesus, and even has Peter stolen from his grasp, then he will at least claim this one traitor as his own. Indeed, all who sin and fail to repent before death overtakes them, share in the stamp of traitor that is pressed upon their souls. While those who have never known baptism and faith might know hell because of ignorance; Judas was probably the first but not the last to betray our Lord as one who had belonged to his grouping of friends. Indeed, while there is arguably a most terrible circle of hell for renegade Christians, Judas stands as a warning to the Church that even bishops and priests can suffer damnation. 

Why would we play games and take chances? Too many are among the walking dead, perpetually working and playing in mortal sin. Failing to go to confession and to receive absolution, they have allowed the spirit of Satan to enter them. Indeed, akin to Judas at the Last Supper, they attend Mass and receive the Eucharist— blasphemies on top of blasphemies. Their priests like Christ could immediately steal them from Satan and return them to the good graces of God if only they would go to confession. But too many will not submit to God’s ministers of mercy or admit to one another or even to themselves, the terrible truth. They have broken their friendship with God. They already have one foot in hell. The longer this situation lasts, the more comfortable they become with sin. They can still be saved but it is increasingly unlikely. Indeed, many will no longer change their hellish trajectory even if they could.  

Proof of this is evidenced when trying to turn someone around. They get angry when anyone challenges their hypocrisy. “Leave me alone! Who are you to tell me about my business! I haven’t hurt anyone! You talk like I’ve killed someone! I know people a lot worse than me!”

Sexual Sins as the Path to Hell

Our Lord employs Hebraic hyperbole in Matthew 5:27-30. Jesus would not have us literally cut off a hand or pluck out an eye. But he wants to emphasize the gravity of sin. The subject is adultery or more to the point, sexual sin. He says, “It is better for you to lose one of your members than to have your whole body go into Gehenna.” I must admit that as a confessor I have weighed more heavily the sins of malice than those of human weakness. But we must be careful of common rationalizations. Many even make comedy about the easy availability of pornography, infidelity and hormonal boys who cannot control themselves. Christ warns us that a human weakness due to concupiscence can quickly become something deadly.  This warning goes against the current of a society that either excuses sexual sin or normalizes it.  Indeed, ours is an erotic age where much of the moral dissent against the Church has to do with human sexuality. Those in same-sex intimate relationships want their bonds publicly recognized. Those in irregular unions (divorced and remarried) want their adultery dismissed for the good of their children and to preserve fellowship with other churchgoers. This is not new but is a return to the Mosaic decree that was permitted because of the hardness of hearts. Jesus dismissed it as illegitimate and pronounced it as the sin of adultery.  It was not what God intended in Genesis.  Just as in the primordial garden, do we listen to God or to the serpent? Many today would share sexual congress without the benefit of marriage. They give away what belongs to a covenant of grace.  Sexual sins are mortal sins. If we die with such sins on the soul, then we go to hell. No amount of ministerial accompaniment will change this trajectory unless we preach the truth, counsel repentance, and finally urge amendment of life. The message of the Gospel is not that we accept others no matter what. No, the message is changeless, “Repent and believe!” 

God would not have us maim or castrate ourselves; rather, he would have us cut out sinful desires and behavior. Sin begins in the heart. We all need spiritual heart surgery. We need to learn how to properly love. Does an addict to pornography care one bit about the girls he sees in images and videos? He fails to appreciate that this is virtual prostitution and that he has reduced people to commodities or meat.  He has devalued them.  A man who takes a woman to his bed without marrying her, both corrupts himself and steals the precious gift of purity from the one he takes to himself. Neither of them will be able to give to a spouse the chaste gift of self. We are our bodies, and they will crave a nuptial unity that is missing. The promiscuous are robbers to the ones they will one day call “spouse.” The divorced and remarried, lacking an annulment, can only feign their union. They give to one what is pledged to another. They too are thieves, even when it seems benevolent. They stand as a contradiction to the Gospel. Jesus is the groom, and the Church is his bride. Every couple in the sacrament of marriage is called to witness something of this fidelity, until death do they part. The matter of same-sex unions is even more problematical. The Church is not opposed to brotherly and sisterly love; but human sexual expression is reserved to men and women in marriage. Anything else is a disorientation.  All these relationships might be defended as LOVE but in truth they signify a failure to love. True love would not risk one’s salvation and eternal life. True love would never chance damning the beloved.  Such sins are false love, literally loving each other into hell.