• Our Blogger

    Fr. Joseph Jenkins

  • The blog header depicts an important and yet mis-understood New Testament scene, Jesus flogging the money-changers out of the temple. I selected it because the faith that gives us consolation can also make us very uncomfortable. Both Divine Mercy and Divine Justice meet in Jesus. Priests are ministers of reconciliation, but never at the cost of truth. In or out of season, we must be courageous in preaching and living out the Gospel of Life. The title of my blog is a play on words, not Flogger Priest but Blogger Priest.

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Barbara King's avatarBarbara King on Ask a Priest
    Ben Kirk's avatarBen Kirk on Ask a Priest
    Jeremy Kok's avatarJeremy Kok on Ask a Priest
    Barbara's avatarBarbara on Ask a Priest
    forsamuraimarket's avatarforsamuraimarket on Ask a Priest

Ask a Priest

Feel free to submit a new question or concern in the comment box below.  Various topics and questions are archived here for easy retrieval.  Please be courteous.  Comments are moderated so please be patient in waiting for them to appear and for any responses.  God bless you!

aboutfrjoe

NEW MESSAGES/HOMILIES   CHRISTIAN REFLECTIONS   DEFENDING THE FAITH

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS   MARY OUR MOTHER

NEWMAN COLLEGE OUTLINES

5,442 Responses

  1. ABOUT CONFESSION OR PENANCE

    Who can forgive sins?

    Only God can forgive sins, and those to whom he has given the power to do so.

    To whom did God give such a power?

    The Scriptures reveal that Jesus gave this power to his apostles. We read in John 20:22-23: “And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and said to them, ‘Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained.’” Our Lord says that all power in heaven and on earth has been given to him, “Peace be with you. As the Father has sent me, even so I send you” (John 20:21). Jesus was sent into the world to forgive sins, and so he similarly sent the apostles.

    Only priests can offer absolution. “All this is from God, who through Christ reconciled us to himself and gave us the ministry of reconciliation; that is, God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and entrusting to us the message of reconciliation. So we are ambassadors for Christ, God making his appeal through us. We beseech you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God” (2 Corinthians 5:18-20).

    Our Lord gave the authority to forgive sins to his apostles who in turn extended it to the bishops and priests. The power to forgive sins is reserved to priests. As long as there is a need for the forgiveness of sins, the priests of the Catholic Church will continue to possess this power from Christ.

    Christ would not abandon his Church. As long as his Church exists, so will his mercy. The tragedy today is that many opt to remain in their sins. One of the greatest spiritual powers of every priest is neglected. The graces of this sacrament cannot be exaggerated. A priest is so configured to Christ that in a few moments of interaction, he can rescue a man or woman who already has one foot in hell.

    Instead of confession, maybe this meant that priests could forgive sins in baptism?

    The Bible makes a clear distinction between the sins forgiven by baptism and those remitted afterwards. Regarding the former, we are told, “Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness [remission] of sins” (Acts 2:38); as for the latter, there is the charge, “If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained” (John 20:23).

    Maybe Christ forgives sins, but not priests?

    Jesus Christ does forgive our sins, provided that we confess them to a priest (particularly if we have the opportunity to do so).

    The Scriptures assert that the forgiveness of sins shall be preached to all nations; if mercy is granted in preaching, why is confession necessary?

    The proclamation of forgiveness points to the remission of sins through baptism, confession, or any other means instituted by the Lord.

    Does not the biblical notion of forgiving sins apply to the excommunication of sinners or their restoration?

    The apostles are given a two-fold power. First, they can forgive sins as our Lord makes clear. Second, they are given the authority to excommunicate. Jesus says, “Truly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven” (Matthew 18:18).

    If Mary Magdalene can have her sins forgiven because she “loved much” then perhaps all sins are similarly forgiven (see Luke 7:47)?

    Mary Magdalene’s outward display of great sorrow in her confession of Jesus brings about the forgiveness of her sins by Christ (who knew her sins). It is not the sentiment of love that is sufficient, but a practical love which results in sorrow, confession if possible, satisfaction and a firm resolve not to sin again. Few priests are given the supernatural power to read souls; thus, unlike Jesus, the priest cannot know what your sins are unless you tell him. This allows the priest to apply an appropriate penance and to give adequate counsel.

    If confession is legitimate, why does the Bible remain silent about it?

    It is not silent. We have already read Christ’s stipulation in its favor. The historical fact that the early Christians, indeed Catholics during the last two thousand years, have confessed their sins is proof that Christ taught the apostles that sins should be confessed.

    While the sacrament is unique to the new dispensation of Christ, the practice of confessing sin was an ancient practice among the Jews. “Say to the people of Israel, When a man or woman commits any of the sins that men commit by breaking faith with the Lord, and that person is guilty, he shall confess his sin which he has committed; and he shall make full restitution for his wrong, …” (Numbers 5:6-7). Similarly, just as we are told not to conceal mortal sins, the Hebrews of old also insisted upon the full truth about our iniquity. Nothing could be hidden from God. Contrite hearts is a necessity for the healing of relationships with God and with one another. “He who conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy” (Proverbs 28:13). “David said [confessed] to Nathan, “I have sinned against the Lord.” And Nathan said [the absolution] to David, “The Lord also has put away your sin; …” (2 Samuel 12:13). St. John the Baptist well understood from the legacy of the prophets that repentance came prior to faith. “Then went out to him Jerusalem and all Judea and all the region about the Jordan, and they were baptized by him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins” (Matthew 3:5-6). This was also the message of Jesus.

    This pattern of repentance-confession-forgiveness comes to full realization in Luke 23:43 where the good thief is promised paradise in return for his confession on the cross. “And he [Jesus] said to him, ‘Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise.’” Confession to God within the Church is attested in 1 John 1:9: “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just, and will forgive our sins and cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”

    Confession of sin is denoted as necessary in the Bible for the forgiveness of sins. It is noted in the early Church. “Many also of those who were now believers came, confessing and divulging their practices” (Acts 19:18). The Catholic practice of private confession is based upon the charge from Christ to forgive or to retain sins. The Church and her ministers judge such situations. The confessor can only fulfill this obligation adequately if the penitent tells him the sins for which he needs absolution and penance. There may also be an important element of counsel.

    But St. Paul said as proof of ourselves, “Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink the cup” (1 Corinthians 11:28). He did not say “Go to confession.” Is there not a real clash?

    St. Paul meant that we should be proved according to the teaching of Christ. In other words, we are to prove and to examine our conscience. If we discover any sins, then we should confess them before “eating of this bread.” Certainly, St. Paul would not contradict Jesus who commanded the apostles to forgive sins.

    As we say in the Lord’s Prayer, “Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us,” are we not forgiven by forgiving others?

    It means that if we want our heavenly Father to forgive our sins, then we must forgive our neighbor. This is more than a precondition connected to human activity. God is not crudely bargaining with us. This line has everything to do with conversion or transformation into a new Christ. We are to imitate and to manifest the loving mercy of God in our very selves. By forgiving others, we become precisely the types of persons who are open to the graces of mercy.

    God can use us in ushering in his kingdom. We grow in holiness because we become revelatory to the face and presence of God. Ultimately, the Father will look upon us and see his Son living in us. He will give us a share in the eternal life that Christ merits on our behalf.

    If sins can readily be forgiven, will it not entice people to easily relapse into sin?

    No, because a good confession demands true sorrow for sin and a firm intention to avoid sin in the future. The more a sinner experiences and expresses his sorrow in confession, the less likely will he return to his sin. This sorrow is more than just “feeling” sorry. It reflects a real remorse over what our sins have accomplished. Our sins inhibit our transformation in Christ, deprive us of grace, and threaten us with the loss of heaven and the pains of hell. While fear of punishment illustrates imperfect contrition; we are all to strive for perfect contrition. This requires that we be conscious of the dishonor our sins bring upon God for whom we are created. They strike down our Savior upon Calvary (often imaged in the Sacred Heart devotion).

    Can it be said that the apostles went to confession?

    We certainly know that our Lord told his apostles to forgive sins; no doubt, if they committed any, they forgave each other’s sins.

    Can a priest charge money for forgiving sins?

    No, this would be a great crime called simony. Severe punishments would be inflicted upon any priest who would dare do something so offensive.

    Can a priest forgive a thief who has no intention to return stolen goods?

    No, the stolen property, if possible, must be restored to the lawful owner or at least a promise must be given that restoration will be made. Only then is the priest at liberty to absolve the sin.

    Does the Bible distinguish any sins as mortal?

    It most certainly does. The Bible tells us that some sins deserve death and that they exclude sinners from the kingdom of heaven. St. Paul states in Galatians 5:19-21: “Now the works of the flesh are plain: immorality, impurity, licentiousness, idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, anger, selfishness, dissension, party spirit, envy, drunkenness, carousing, and the like. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.” St. Paul enumerates a number of serious or mortal sins in 1 Corinthians. Exclusion from the kingdom of God literally means damnation.

    Does the Bible mention any sins as venial (more easily forgiven)?

    Again, the answer is yes. “For a righteous man falls seven times, and rises again” (Proverbs 24:16). Evidently it is possible for a righteous or just man to commit certain sins and not forfeit his good status. However, if a person commits a mortal sin, he can no longer be considered righteous or just. [Also see James 3:2.]

    Is there a clear biblical teaching that God punishes mortal sins with temporal and eternal punishments?

    This is the case. David was guilty of murder, which merited the pains of hell (2 Samuel 12:9). Nathan warned him of his mortal peril. David repents: “I have sinned against the Lord” (2 Samuel 12:13). Nathan responds as the voice of God: “The Lord has put away your sin,” (2 Samuel 12:13) that is, the eternal punishment of hell. Nathan continues: “You shall not die. Nevertheless, because by this deed you have utterly scorned the Lord, the child that is born to you shall die” (2 Samuel 12:13-14). This was clearly temporal punishment.

    How is the Sacrament of Penance administered?

    The ritual begins with the sign of the cross. The penitent will often ask for a blessing and acknowledge how long it has been since the last confession. He confesses his sins. The priest might offer some fatherly advice, a penance is imposed, the act of contrition is said and absolution is given.

    What are the essential words of absolution?

    “God, the Father of mercies, through the death and resurrection of his Son has reconciled the world to himself and sent the Holy Spirit among us for the forgiveness of sins; through the ministry of the Church, may God give you pardon and peace, and I ABSOLVE YOU FROM YOUR SINS IN THE NAME OF THE FATHER, AND OF THE SON, + AND OF THE HOLY SPIRIT. Amen.”

  2. Reconciliation

    The one sacrament which has gone through the most development and change is probably reconciliation (also called penance or confession). During the first days of the early Church, the followers of Jesus were especially devout and zealous; after all, they believed that Christ’s second coming was eminent. However, as the years passed and many of the first witnesses of Jesus began to die, the Church was forced to the realization that the Lord might want his friends to continue and to spread his ministry in the world for some time prior to his return. This and the later acceptance and endorsement of Christianity in the empire resulted in more and more adherents who lacked zeal and who were very much in the grip of weakness and sin. The sacrament of baptism remitted both original and all personal sin. However, since baptism was a one-time sacrament, the problem became what to do with the person who fell back into the old ways of sin? At first, there were those who argued that such people could not be re-admitted to the Church body or to the sacraments. Because of this dilemma and the desire of people to be saved, many waited until their deathbeds for baptism. Those who were especially cast out were those who renounced Christ in order to save their lives from Roman persecution and execution. Quite interestingly, those who remained steadfast and survived, sort of as “living martyrs,” were envisioned by many as having the ability to offer God’s forgiveness to those who were less faithful. As this category of people in need of reconciliation grew, the Church discerned her ability to offer second penance whereby the Christian could be forgiven once after baptism. As in the story of the prodigal son or of the lost sheep, God would reach out still to forgive his own. Again, many people fell and postponed their reconciliation until either impending death or advanced age seemed to guarantee them success. This second penance was not an easy matter. The penances were often quite severe, including all sorts of humiliations, fasting, constant prayer, servitude, and even hair-skin shirts which itched and disciplined the flesh. Again, human nature proved vulnerable. There was much debate. The understanding that while we were weak, God was strong, came to predominance. The Scriptures were recalled where Jesus told his disciples that one was to forgive seventy times seven times (Matthew 18). If such were to be our individual practice, could it be any less for the Church as a whole? No.

    This sacrament has taken upon itself many external forms during its long history. The Eastern churches have kept much of the practice of seeking pardon in the midst of the assembly. They walked up to the priest, who sometimes covered their heads with a cloth, and the sins were whispered and then forgiven. During the early centuries, certain sins were announced publicly when a repentant person sought forgiveness. This was a clear indication that they saw their sins hurting not only themselves but the whole church community. When a person was not what he was called to be, he could not consequently be a steadfast support or faithful witness of the Gospel for others. (Sin touches all, even those sins which are hidden and deeply personal). Obviously, even in the first few centuries, there were certain sins only told to the priest, in order to avoid grievous scandal. In the West, we have owed an immense debt to the Irish Penitentials, who in their development of penance, not only offered it repeatedly, but discretely behind a screen— the start of the confessional box. This offered an opportunity for privacy for which many yearned. Today, confession is offered both behind a screen or face-to-face with the priest.

    Some outside the Church might erroneously surmise that Catholicism invented this sacrament. However, its history proves this to be false. Although we, along with many other Christians, believe that a simple act of contrition is sufficient to forgive some sins; Catholic Christians have a highly developed communitarian perspective of how sin touches the Church body and how she needs forgiveness and healing. This hints to the rationale of a link between reconciliation and the sacrament of the sick. The priest represents the presence of Christ present in the Church offering forgiveness in this sacrament. The priest is configured to Christ in such an intense way that Jesus directly forgives the sins of Church members through him. After the absolution, we can have the assurance of knowing our sins are pardoned. The priest’s absolution frees us from sin and from at least some degree of the temporal punishment due to it. It helps us to grow in divine grace and makes us stronger in the struggle to disentangle ourselves from Satan so as to live in true holiness. Jesus has promised us that the Church does indeed possess this authority. When the Lord appeared to his apostles on the first Easter Sunday, he told them: “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive men’s sins, they are forgiven them; if you hold them bound, they are held bound” (John 20:22-23).

    The Church has declared that it is necessary to confess each and every serious “subjective” mortal sin after an intense deliberation of our conscience. The priest needs to know the sins in order to make proper judgments and in order to direct his prayers to the appropriate need. St. Augustine reaffirmed this point in the fourth century, “It is not enough that one acknowledges his sins to God, from whom nothing is hidden; he must also confess them to a priest, God’s representative.”

    The Church has long made distinctions between sins in terms of mortal and venial. This is evident in day-to-day living; after all, there is a difference between let’s say an act of cold-bloodied murder and the snatching of a stray grape in the grocery store. Mortal sin is the most serious and technically it means driving God out of ourselves and our lives. It is the rejection of his gift of salvation. Venial means a lesser offense, which we are encouraged to confess in the sacrament of reconciliation. Mortal sin requires that the act in itself be serious matter, that the person knows or thinks he knows that it is most grievously wrong, and that a person gives full consent to it. Unless the person repents and offers an act of sorrow, seeking confession, such a person is asked to refrain from the Eucharist in order as to not commit sacrilege.

    The rite of penance has several parts:

    1. CONTRITION – No sin is forgiven by God without supernatural sorrow. This contrition may be imperfect (fear of punishment and the loss of heaven) or perfect (love of God and remorse over what we have done to him on Calvary). Further, there must be a firm resolution to avoid the sin in the future.

    2. CONFESSION – The power of the keys to salvation, given to the Church, can respond to the person who acknowledges that he is indeed a sinner in need of healing and mercy. Prior to the actual confession of sin, an examination of conscience is made. This is essential. The deliberate concealment of a mortal sin constitutes another serious offense against God. One is not obliged to tell every venial sin, although it is a good practice in seeking holiness.

    3. ABSOLUTION – After our confession and a verbal act of contrition, the priest extends his hand and pronounces the words of absolution: “God, the Father of mercies, through the death and resurrection of his Son has reconciled the world to himself and sent the Holy Spirit among us for the forgiveness of sins; through the ministry of the Church may God give you pardon and peace, and I absolve you from your sins in the name of the Father, and of the Son, + and of the Holy Spirit.”

    4. ACT OF PENANCE (Satisfaction) – Penance demonstrates true conversion and reparation of injury. The gulf between human forgiveness and divine mercy becomes readily apparent. When God forgives, he treats the sin as something forgotten, put behind his back— not to be looked at again. We need to strive to do the same in putting the past behind us and in living for God here in the present. The penance itself is often merely prayer(s) or in cases like theft, may involve restitution. These acts display our repentance as something genuine. We are offering words and actions as presents to God in return for his precious gift of forgiveness. The satisfaction follows absolution.

    To safeguard the sacrament, the priest is bound to keep “the seal” of confession, keeping what he hears secret, even if it means death. Minimally, all in serious sin are obliged to confess at least once a year; however, more regular attendance is encouraged for all. We should be receiving a worthy Holy Communion and be ready when God calls us home.

  3. By what power or authority does a Priest have in the confessional to give absolution?

  4. Hello! Is it considered detraction that I went to my teacher and vaguely mentioned how the people in my group project for school didn’t really cite their sources on the PowerPoint? I went to her because I was worried that she would think I approved of them not citing their sources, and then I would’ve have been like sinning by submitting the project without citing sources. SO I went to the teacher to avoid something that I thought would be a sin, but I was also worried that telling the teacher that not everyone cited their sources on the slides would be a grave sin. So was that considered serious detraction? I am very scrupulous so would appreciate your answer! Thank you

    FATHER JOE: Sharing such (truthful) information with a teacher is not detraction.

  5. Fr. Joe,
    If a Catholic marries a non-baptised person do they receive the sacrament of marriage?

    FATHER JOE: No, it is a natural bond. If the non-baptized person gets baptized then the marriage will automatically become a sacrament.

  6. I believe in god but I don’t think he answers our prayers because if he did doesn’t that give you solid proof and wouldn’t that take your faith away and also I know god is a fair god so if he really does answer our prayers why would he answer some peoples prayers and not others

    FATHER JOE: God hears and answers all prayer. However, sometimes he says YES, sometimes he says NO and he might even say NOT NOW. Trust in divine providence. Peace!

  7. Father, i just completed the life and prayer workshop, I am now suppose to spread the gospel, if I worked hospice at the hospitals reading passages from the Bible and praying from my pita book, would that be considered minisering and spreading the gospel?

    FATHER JOE: Most hospitals and hospice programs have strict rules about access that would probably make it difficult or impossible to do as you suggest.

  8. Why does my wife leave me depressed and angry ALL the time. Is it time to leave?

    FATHER JOE: Sounds like it is time for marriage counseling.

  9. Thank you Father. He has heart and lung problems and is frightened when he asks me to stay home. It is a comfort to know I’m with him. I attend Mass every Sunday except if he needs me. I feel i need to be eith him.

  10. Thank you Father

  11. Dear Father
    I am so distracted by people who file in late for mass, many times during the gospel reading or homily. I find it disrespectful to the church and to the congregation and nothing is being done about it. Why do they come at all when they already missed half of the services? It makes me angry

    FATHER JOE: I can certainly understand your sentiment. I have mentioned the problem many times but to no avail. I knew one priest who locked the doors after Mass started but he had to give up the practice by order of the fire marshall. Churches with large staffing are known to keep late visitors in the back or in reception areas until the completion of the readings or even until the offertory. But what does it mean for people spiritually to miss the liturgy of the Word? It used to be the understanding that if you missed the Gospel then one failed to satisfy the precept of the Church. Oh well, getting angry will not help matters. I would recommend prayer. Maybe even a few added words could be added to the bidding prayers? “Dear Lord for those visitors who routinely come late to Mass and disturb others at prayer, grant them a greater desire to participate at your liturgy or at least get them alarm clocks, we pray… Lord, hear our prayer.”

  12. My husband is ill and at times asks me to stay home from Sunday mass because he feels sick. Is this a sin. I feel my duty is to his care

    FATHER JOE: I suppose it depends upon what is wrong with him and the service you provide for him. It is certainly a charitable act to care for one who is sick. God bless!

  13. Father
    This is an addition to the question regarding attending the Lutheran church. I have been to confession for not having attended Mass and Holy Days of Obligation. I did not think of this at the time of my confession.I just want to know so that I can either take Holy Communion or do I have to confess this before receiving Holy Communion.

    FATHER JOE: If it was “purposely withheld” then you should take it to Confession as soon as possible.

  14. Hello Father
    Is it considered a mortal sin for a Catholic to have attended a Lutheran church for a couple of years and while there you received their communion?

    FATHER JOE: A Catholic cannot satisfy the precept for Mass attendance by going to a Protestant church. This binds us under pain of mortal sin. We are also forbidden to take communion in other churches.

  15. Hi Father Joe, my question is referring to a catholic that was married outside the church without approval. I understand that the person who is catholic cannot receive the sacraments of the church, like communion. But what about the sacrament of reconciliation? Can this person still confess his or her sins and receive absolution with the exception of the marriage. Thank you for your time and service to us all,

    FATHER JOE: Marrying outside the Church is a serious sin. Deliberately withholding a serious or mortal sin in Confession constitutes the serious sin of sacrilege. A bad Confession leaves a person in sin and further ruptures the relationship with God. Absolution cannot validly be given while the couple only feign marriage and avoid the sacrament or bond in the Church.

  16. Here’s a big question for me…Why is it that we have the 10 commandments? The bible talks about a lot of other things God told us not to do. Are these things less of a sin? When I say “these things” I mean something like pre-marital sex, or getting drunk. Neither of those acts are talked about in the 10 commandments. There is no commandment 11th commandment saying “thou shalt not get drunk…nor is there a 12th saying “you must wait until you’re married to have sex.” So are these acts less of a sin than it you were to say, commit adultery, or steal? I know there may be varying levels of sin, but in the end sin is sin, and sin separates us from God. I mean is stealing $100 worse than pre-marital sex…? After all stealing break one of the 10 commandments. Having premarital sex does not – The Bible just says it’s bad. Let me know if you’d like clarification.

    FATHER JOE: The Decalogue or Ten Commandments were not entirely unique to the Jews, they also reflected basic rules that other nations and people observed. They were deemed important, both for personal and corporate morality. The latter reason is why we have a limited number, as the glue or consensus (under God) for a healthy and unified society. Personal morality would include sins not definitively mentioned but which could be delineated from the list. Thus, all sexual sins could be catalogued under THOU SHALT NOT COMMIT ADULTERY and THOU SHALT NOT COVET THY NEIGHBOR’s SPOUSE (WIFE). Getting inebriated would fall under THOU SHALT NOT KILL as it includes anything that damages or hurts ourselves or others. Breaking contracts or covenants would come under THOU SHALT NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS. Children that neglect aging parents and parents (or those to whom they extend their authority like teachers) who abuse or hurt children violate THOU SHALT HONOR THY MOTHER AND FATHER. Not paying workers a just wage or receiving stolen goods would fall under THOU SHALT NOT STEAL. These are only a few examples.

  17. Hello Father Joe,

    I have a question that has been bothering me greatly. I’m a 35-year-old Catholic who met a 36-year-old Catholic man 4 weeks ago. We are both devout Catholics and follow the church’s teachings. For many years, I had been praying hard everyday pleading God for a spouse like St. Joseph and St. Anthony. When I met my current boyfriend, who is my first serious relationship, I felt that he was the sweetest man because he had many wonderful qualities that made it so easy for me to fall in love with him. I truly felt like God had finally answered my prayers and seen my struggles and tears over the years. I believed that God had sent me a man who had all the qualities of St. Joseph including the one quality that meant the most to me: being a virgin. I’ve always dreamed of being with a man who was as pure as I was and who would never compare me to others. I knew it would be extremely difficult, in this day and age, to find a man who had saved himself for marriage but I also believed that nothing was impossible with God. All the time I was dating him I assumed that he was a virgin because of how he spoke openly about his fear of God and how he never really had a serious relationship with a woman. He told me he loved me recently and I reciprocated his feelings. Everything was great, we talked about the future and about raising a family. Then, last night he told me he wanted to be open and honest with me. He said 10 years ago he slept with a girl and she was the first and last girl he ever slept with. He said he was never in love with her. This news completely devastated me and shattered my image of him. He said that he regrets it so much and wishes he could erase it because he knows how much it has affected me. I know he really cares about me and is hurt seeing me this way but I’m so heartbroken. I feel like I can eventually forgive him but I don’t know if I can forget it and try to fall in love with him again. Please help me. I don’t know what to do.

    Thank you so much for your time Father.

    FATHER JOE: It happened long before he knew you and God has forgiven him. Who are you to now hold it against him? If this caused you to fall out of love with him then you were in love with love, not him. If you love him then you would forgive and dismiss the past. The problem is you, not him. If you want a perfect man then enter the convent and spiritually marry Jesus. Otherwise, open your eyes and heart to a man who says he loves you.

  18. Hello Father Joe,

    After Mass today, a fellow Eucharistic minister asked me if she thought she could ask the Pastor if she could bring Eucharist home to her family who didn’t attend Mass (they are not sick or homebound).
    I replied that it would not be appropriate.
    Was I correct?
    Could the Pastor have given her permission to do this??

    Thank you.

    FATHER JOE: You were correct, we do not take communion to people for the sake of convenience. We bring the sacrament to the sick and homebound. Further, if healthy people are deliberately missing Sunday Mass, they should go to confession so as to be absolved of mortal sin.

  19. Father, I am a CNA who works mostly with Hospice or Dementia patients. Recently I was asked to fill in for a week at a client’s house for a coworker who was sick. The client practices Santeria. Generally, I don’t let a person’s beliefs interfere with my willingness to work or my interactions with the patient. However, I’ve now been asked to continue working in the household because the regular caregiver is still sick. Today, I asked to be replaced because I’m not comfortable with things that have been said or that I’ve seen there. I also admit to being a little bit afraid. As a Catholic, but also as a caregiver, am I wrong to stop working with the client? I feel guilty about this decision- that I’m a coward and not strong enough in my faith to overcome my fear and misgivings. I would greatly appreciate any guidance you can give.

    FATHER JOE: As long as there is someone who might replace you, I think you are within your rights. Otherwise, I think your employment and human compassion would require you to stick it out. Keep a sacramental like a rosary or a medal to St. Michael on your person. Let them know that you are prohibited from joining them in their religious practices. I would not hesitate, should they ask, to let them know that you view Santeria as a conflict to your Christian faith.

  20. Hi,
    Is it wrong to say that you hate something? I know that the word “hate” is very strong, especially the way it is used in the Bible . But, it doesn’t seem that strong anymore because usually people use it when they are talking about someone or something they greatly dislike.

    FATHER JOE: It all depends upon what we target. There is a big difference between hating asparagus or beets, sleet and rain, and terrorism as opposed to hating God and your neighbor.

  21. Hello Father,

    My question is in regard to what the Catechism says about masturbation. The second paragraph states:
    [CCC 2352] “To form an equitable judgment about the subjects’ moral responsibility and to guide pastoral action, one must take into account the affective immaturity, force of acquired habit, conditions of anxiety or other psychological or social factors that lessen, if not even reduce to a minimum, moral culpability.”

    I have a doubt regarding this second paragraph. It talks about the things a pastor has to take into consideration to determine: first, the gravity of each sin for each particular case set before him, and second, the way he ought to deal with the issue.

    These things are:

    1. affective immaturity
    2. force of acquired habit
    3. conditions of anxiety or other psychological or social factors

    I would like, if it is possible, a definition for each one of these factors and I would like to see, by means of a few illustrative examples, how each one of these variables affects both the culpability and the pastoral action.

    Thanks and God bless!

    FATHER JOE:

    (1) Affective maturity has to do with actual maturation which can be correlated with age but not absolutely determined by such. It can be argued that people of the past matured to become true adults earlier in life. Today we have extended childhood. Many teens and young adults are hard-pressed to take responsibility and a number are pampered by their parents. When life was short and work was hard, people immediately became aware of the duties required of them to secure their families and to earn their daily bread. Juveniles often struggled with the hormonal changes in their bodies and masturbation (even as wrong) was an element of self-discovery. Today, young people especially are always seeking thrills and pleasure… from video games to sexual awakening. However, without adult resources and duties, they do not have the wherewithal for marriage and starting families. They struggle with delaying gratification.

    (2) We are creatures of habit and unfortunately we are increasingly directed to vices instead of virtues. People today struggle with a whole host of addictions: alcohol, over-eating, smoking, sexually acting out, pain-killers and drugs, pornography, gaming, gambling, etc. Addictions are very difficult to break and to do so often requires faith and structured recovery programs.

    (3) Many people are awkward and/or anxious about relationships. Masturbation which is often connected to pornography avoids reality for the life of fantasy. Self-absorption replaces real social interaction, at least in terms of face-to-face relationships. Due to the new technologies, often the virtual supplants the physical when it comes to personal networking with others. People are afraid that they will be rejected. They are afraid of the costs affiliated with romantic liaisons. They do not know how to properly date or court, having much of their formation conducted by a coarse and hedonistic media. Pornography has gone main-stream making any custody of the eyes difficult or impossible. At a time when there are widespread charges of abuse and harassment, there has been a devaluation of the dignity inherent to persons as simply bodies to be exploited or desired by voyeurs. Although those with serious intellectual impairment would lack much in the way of culpability, some are psychologically stunted by the current secular and sexually-obsessed environment. The contraceptive mentality is opposed to any notions of restraint or self-control or waiting. There are also proponents for self-abuse who argue that like homosexual activity, it constitutes an acceptable lifestyle choice. The voice of the Church is often eclipsed in this environment. If masturbation were a practice that juveniles eventually grew to put behind them; today, it is a practice that follows men and women into their later years.

  22. Father Joseph Jenkins,
    I am not new to the catholic faith. I am a teenager. My family strayed away from the church and I never really learned anything about the faith. We sometimes go to church. I have a bible, a rosary, and other tools of faith, but am unsure how to read the bible, or use my faith. Do you know where to start with faith and the bible? Do you know which books of the catholic bible are symbolic and which ones are not? I love God, but am confused with where to start with everything. I am unsure if I am being a true follower. I have given up some music for better, religious music. I am trying to show God I love him, but need help with my faith. I try not to sin. Can you please help me with my faith? I hope to grow my faith.
    Thanks,
    Nikki

    FATHER JOE:

    The best place to start is with your Catholic parish. There are catechetical efforts and often youth groups.

    Here are some links that might be useful:

    Prove It! Catholic Teen Bible

    The Catholic Faith Handbook for Youth

    Youcat

    Life Teen

    Catholic Teens

    Other Catholic Teen Links

  23. Dear Father, I desire God’s healing in my body (and of course my soul). I am taking medication for anxiety, hypertension, and sleep. I have several doctors including a natural leaning doctor. Will you pray for me to God’s help and healing so that I can eat and take my meds without stomach distress.

    FATHER JOE: I am saying a prayer for you right now. Blessings.

  24. Hi! Ever since my father died early this year, I’ve been wondering about where he is, like if he is still with us even if we don’t see him, or if he could hear us or feel how much we miss him. I tried to look for biblical answers to my questions about souls and where they go, and I read that they are no longer with the beings of this earth. That when people die, they fall into a very deep sleep and will only awaken on judgment day. On the other hand, I also read about , I got confused after reading about Pade Pio’s encounters with souls in purgatory, and even about other ordinary Catholics’ stories about souls asking the living to pray for them. My question now is, if the Bible says that souls are in a deep sleep, how could’ve Padre Pio and the others talked to souls in purgatory as they claim they have? Please enlighten me, Father. I really want to know where my father is right now. Thank you.

    FATHER JOE:

    We commend our beloved dead to the Lord and we can pray for them. That is all we can do. We leave judgment to God. Trust that Jesus will properly care for your father.

    The notion of soul-sleep (as espoused by the Adventists) is not the classical Christian view about the dead. The sect denies the existence of the soul and hell. They claim the righteous will be remade and that the damned will cease to exist. It is a false interpretation of the Bible.

    We are told in the Apostles’ Creed that Jesus descended unto the dead or hell (not the hell of the damned but the limbo of the fathers) where righteous souls before the coming of Christ awaited the Savior. Note also the Transfiguration scene in Scripture where Moses and Elijah appear alongside Jesus. They are not sleeping.

    Jesus has promised us a share in his resurrected life and that he has a place for us in his house (the kingdom of heaven). The dead are aware and not unconscious or asleep. When the Church uses the terms “sleep” or “eternal rest,” we mean that the time of earthly testing is over. The so-called sleep of the grave also refers to the period between our particular judgment (after death) and the general or final judgment (at the judgment and consummation of the world). Our souls will be reunited with our bodies and we will be glorified.

    We believe that in Christ the saints are aware of us and can pray for us. The souls of heaven know only joy and they see God face-to-face. There are other souls that are being perfected by the fire of God as they approach him (this is what we call purgation or purgatory). These are the dead for which we pray.

    There are other souls that have rejected God’s love. These souls suffer hell.

  25. Hello, Father! I have two questions,
    1) Is lying always a mortal sin? I’m not talking about emergency. I sometimes lie about what seem to be small things, I exaggerate and then I try to soften it by saying something like: “Or actually I’m not sure about it if it really was so; I must check!” I sometimes lie without being aware of it at the moment; the moment after I understand that my information contained false facts.
    2) My wife watches shows and reads literature about psychics, mediums, fortunetellers and new-age Although I haven’t forced any “law” about it (how could I), since she is not catholic. . Since she knows that I consider these things sinful and don’t like them, she now tries to keep up the research but avoiding me to find out about it (partially because she probably doesn’t want to hurt me). I am fully aware that she still deals with these things.
    We’re married in Catholic church (she was baptised as a Lutheran, she prays rosary daily and before the birth of our first (and yet only) child, she used to attend sundays mass sometimes with me (voluntarily); she fully agrees to baptise our children, has same views about family, abortion, marriage etc
    What would be the loving-caring and still Christian way for me to deal with this situation?

    FATHER JOE:

    The old online version of the Catholic Encyclopedia (following Aquinas) states, “The hurtful lie is a mortal sin, but merely officious and jocose lies are of their own nature venial.”

    As for your wife’s interest in the occult, it may simply be curiosity. You can try to direct her to Catholic sources on such matters:

    Superstition by Rev. H. Thurston

    Purgatory: Explained by the Lives and Legends of the Saints by Rev. Fr. F. X. Shouppe S.J.

    An Exorcist Explains the Demonic: The Antics of Satan and His Army of Fallen Angels by Fr. Gabriele Amorth

    Saints Who Battled Satan: Seventeen Holy Warriors Who Can Teach You How to Fight the Good Fight and Vanquish Your Ancient Enemy by Paul Thigpen Ph.D

    Shane Leslie’s Ghost Book by Shane Leslie

Leave a comment