• Our Blogger

    Fr. Joseph Jenkins

  • The blog header depicts an important and yet mis-understood New Testament scene, Jesus flogging the money-changers out of the temple. I selected it because the faith that gives us consolation can also make us very uncomfortable. Both Divine Mercy and Divine Justice meet in Jesus. Priests are ministers of reconciliation, but never at the cost of truth. In or out of season, we must be courageous in preaching and living out the Gospel of Life. The title of my blog is a play on words, not Flogger Priest but Blogger Priest.

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Anonymous's avatarAnonymous on Ask a Priest
    Michael J's avatarMichael J on Ask a Priest
    Jeremy Kok's avatarJeremy Kok on Ask a Priest
    Mike Zias's avatarMike Zias on Ask a Priest
    Jeremy Kok's avatarJeremy Kok on Ask a Priest

Have You Found Any Contradictions in Your Holy Text?

Posted on May 8, 2024 by Father Joe

Krystal Smith poses this question at STAPLER CONFESSIONS and states: “Religious people tend to acknowledge the differences between modern society and antiquity. Beyond this, there are certain passages or certain aspects of the Bible and other holy texts that cause scrutiny from atheists under the context that they contradict statements made in other passages. Some more reformed believers consider biblical texts as being open to interpretation and metaphorical.  Atheists tend to reject holy texts, citing any apparent contradictions they can find and pointing out what they consider to be flaws in the text.”

The Bible offers salvation truth, but it also reflects various situations and the development of a people over a period of 2,700 to 3,400 years. While certain truths about God and commandments are immutable, others develop or change due to the maturation of Israel and the intervention of Christ. Our Lord would rescind the Mosaic writ of divorce and the early Church would place faith in Christ over the saving works of the law.  All foods are made clean, and baptism replaces circumcision as the rite of initiation. The prohibition against graven images, which was never absolute, is totally abrogated by the new economy of the incarnation. The keeping of the sabbath day would transition to the Lord’s Day due to the resurrection.

The Bible is not a science book, and its history is not like the news with video clips. All is viewed through the prism of the Semitic people and the cultures through which they lived.  However, it should be mentioned that even atheists have their books and despite competing string theories and constantly corrected conjectures about evolutionary development, they can be every bit as dogmatic as theists.  The Bible is many books and includes all sorts of literature: history, myths, speeches, hymns, legal codes, poetry, etc. Each must be understood as the genre it is.

Note that Genesis itself has differing depictions of the chronology to creation in the first two chapters. The Hebrews saw no problem with this, and neither should we. Different threads of tradition focus on varying elements. We see this as well in the four Gospels of the New Testament. Each proclaims the same Good News of Jesus from the perspective of a different angle or tradition.      

Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a comment »

Do You Think Believing in an Afterlife Affects the Way You Behave in This Life?

Posted on May 7, 2024 by Father Joe

Krystal Smith poses this question at STAPLER CONFESSIONS and states: “Atheists might point out the idea that some believers could allow the concept of an afterlife, heaven and hell, or reincarnation to weigh the significance of the events in their worldly life. The presumption that death isn’t the end could have an influence of people’s behavior and day to day decision making.”

This is a no brainer.  If religion with threats of eternal perdition cannot restrain some from evil acts, why should we expect atheism to do any better? Atheists have neither perfect contrition (sorrow for having offended God whom we are to love) or the imperfect (fear of the fires of hell and the loss of heaven).  Where is the incentive to be good when we can only expect to be forgotten and the looming prospect of becoming worm food?

The Christian perspective is more complex than simple reward and punishment.  The posture of the creature to the Creator is one of obedience and adoration.  We have been promised a share in Christ’s life and the reward of happiness in the presence of God forever. However, we do not deserve salvation and could not merit it on our own. Humanity fell from grace and God made a promise to redeem us— but this is entirely on the level of gift, not entitlement (no matter how good we might be). Even if God should have decided to leave us estranged from him; we would still be obliged to worship and obey him.  We thank God for what he gives us, but we praise or give him glory for who he is.  This is the high ground of Christian discipleship.  It is true that the resurrection is the hook of Christianity, and the prospect of heavenly reward or hellish punishment is real— but we are to love God because he is God.  The gifts he gives us are wonderful but there is no bargaining with God. Our love must be freely returned to God.  The love of a saint is not for sale and cannot be bought.  If God can love us then we must freely love God in return, even if our lot is suffering, sickness and death. Many fail to understand this. Note that some equate prayer entirely with petition— they want this, that, and the other thing.  The highest prayer of praise or adoration is very different— I love you; you know I love you; I will always love you.  We sing glory to God, not to pamper a deity but to pour out hearts to a God for whom we were made.

Having said all this, some will only be good because there is reward or punishment.  This appreciation is at the basis of most legal systems.  Do something wrong and you will face fines or imprisonment. There is something of it in the classroom as well. Get an “A” and you pass and have promotion. Get an “F” and you fail and get sent back. But truthfully, the Christian perspective looks at all of us as failures.  We receive merit or know victory in the salutary work of Christ and his Cross.  Jesus pays the price for us. Of course, it is a gift that must be received. Disposition is everything. 

The atheist must live with his failure. No matter what his earthly achievements, the end of one is the same for all.  No matter whether one is rich or poor, powerful or weak, good or evil, healthy or sick— it all comes to the same thing— absolutely nothing.  We along with all our works will be reduced to dust.  We might find some short satisfaction in the present, but loss, pain and death will quickly follow.  You cannot win. We all live in vain. Indeed, all the works of humanity will one day be destroyed and like the various species before us, we will know extinction. This view portrays humanity as a cosmic accident. There is no deeper meaning or purpose and definitely no hope.    

Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

« Previous Page